Hi guys, if Apple release new TB displays, 4K or higher (27" retina, 5120x2880) resolution, will current iMac, with 680MX graphics, support it?
Thanks a lot.
Thanks a lot.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Will current iMac (2012) drive 4K displays?
- Thread starter wmy5
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
I do not believe the current (and previous iMacs with Thunderbolt) will support a 4K display. I think that is one of the features of Thunderbolt 2.
You answered a hardware question with a software answer.
TB(1) has the bandwidth to drive a 4K display. (It can't, though, drive 3 of them at the same time, like TB2 can).
"Support" means different things to different people. If I say "Yes, it supports it", but what that means is, "Yes, you can make the connection and get a picture, but all you can really see is your wallpaper and a slowly painting application", many people would say "then why did you say it supports it?"
If you can currently drive 2 Thundebolt 27" screens wouldn't one 4K screen be less pixels? In my head that makes it possible. Not sure about running 2 though!
One 4k display would carry 2.25 times the pixels of the current Thunderbolt Display, 3,686,400 pixels vs 8,294,400. It could definitely power it's own 4k display if apple were so inclined
To run a thunderbolt 4k display, you will need the newly revised thunderbolt 2 port only found on the Mac pro atm. in terms of software i'am not sure whether Mountain Lion supports 4k resolution.
Your safest bet is to it give a couple of years when the technology will become adopted more rapidly and the prices drop, also there is no content in 4k unless you want to watch home brew movies. If you desperately want a 4k wait for the macbook retina to get thunderbolt 2 ports and than get yourself the rumoured 4k thunderbolt monitor.
Your safest bet is to it give a couple of years when the technology will become adopted more rapidly and the prices drop, also there is no content in 4k unless you want to watch home brew movies. If you desperately want a 4k wait for the macbook retina to get thunderbolt 2 ports and than get yourself the rumoured 4k thunderbolt monitor.
iMac tech specs say it will drive an external monitor up to 2560x1600.
4K needs Thunderbolt 2 or HDMI 1.4, neither of which are on the current Mac.
4K also needs GPU support, which the HD4000 spec does, but the drivers do not, probably an OS limit (but OS X must be changing with Mavericks to support the new Mac Pro and possibly others).
4K needs Thunderbolt 2 or HDMI 1.4, neither of which are on the current Mac.
4K also needs GPU support, which the HD4000 spec does, but the drivers do not, probably an OS limit (but OS X must be changing with Mavericks to support the new Mac Pro and possibly others).
Why someone would need 4K? Ok, it looks good, but do not be a technology junky. Spending more in things you do not need or will ever use.
I work on TV, HD is ok but then you compress the signal big time and just one other network has the capacity to fully show HD. 4K... for get about it.
I work on TV, HD is ok but then you compress the signal big time and just one other network has the capacity to fully show HD. 4K... for get about it.
I personally can't wait for 4k support. I'm anticipating ditching my 2012 imac, for a 32 inch 4k panel, and mac mini, next year sometime.
Yes, you can use it at 2560x1440.
With some hacks, you can drive a 4K display but only at 30 Hz.
Ok Thanks. Don't know why I asked about a 4k display when I'm looking to connect a Dell U2715H monitor to my late 2012 iMac.
[edit] Also, since the U2715H monitor only comes with a mini display / display port cable. Does anyone know if I can use this cable to connect to my iMac's thunderbolt port for the monitor?
[edit] Also, since the U2715H monitor only comes with a mini display / display port cable. Does anyone know if I can use this cable to connect to my iMac's thunderbolt port for the monitor?
Last edited:
Can someone explain a bit more to me?
I am looking at the Cintiq 27QHD with 1440p, which sounds like it should be fine using ether HDMI or display port from a 27inch late 2012 iMac with the MX680 Nividia card through the TB port using an adapter.
But maybe not the HDMI? Nividia says the MX680 has HDMI 1.4, but above in this thread, it says the late 2012 imacs do not support HDMI 1.4.
I have been saving up all year, and christmas is almost here
I am looking at the Cintiq 27QHD with 1440p, which sounds like it should be fine using ether HDMI or display port from a 27inch late 2012 iMac with the MX680 Nividia card through the TB port using an adapter.
But maybe not the HDMI? Nividia says the MX680 has HDMI 1.4, but above in this thread, it says the late 2012 imacs do not support HDMI 1.4.
I have been saving up all year, and christmas is almost here
So, I recently picked up a Samsung UHD display and the 2012 iMac will drive 3840x2160 @30Hz with an Active Mini Displayport - HDMI Adapter. I'm running OSX 10.10. It's a pleasant surprise considering my buddies MBP 2015 only has an HDMI 1.4 port and can only run 4K-30 as well.