i'm in the market of a new mac, and depending on what happens in the next upgrade, my choice will probably be as follows:
Code:
[b][color="seagreen"]//assuming all non mentioned specs are equal to or better than today[/color][/b]
[b][color="darkorchid"]if[/color][/b] (the mba 13" gets a backlit keyboard)
i'll buy the mba 13" fully loaded.
[b][color="darkorchid"]else if[/color][/b] (mbp 13" continues [b]&&[/b] screen res >= 1440x900 [b]&&[/b] cpu > c2d)
i'll buy the mbp 13" and eventually install ssd later.
[b][color="darkorchid"]else[/color][/b]
i'll buy the mbp 15".
it might seem totally irrational that the lack of one more or less cosmetic feature can cause me to go for a (nearly!) twice as heavy computer instead, but there is a rationale behind it after all; i cannot accept the
removal of a backlit keyboard in a $1800-computer, nor can i accept less than 1440x900 in a 13" computer (mba 13" has it, mbp 13" doesn't). C2d in the mbp 13" is blatantly absurd this long after ix has been released - and frankly, i'm not even sure if they will continue the mbp 13" or not.
When ssds become cheap, i can install it in my mbp 15" later when i can afford it. According to my estimates, that will take shorter time (counting from mbp 15" purchase) than the lifespan of the mba 13" anyway.