Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

sillycyber

macrumors member
Original poster
Oct 30, 2016
57
30
The Great Northwest
When developing and iPhone app in XCode and testing on the device, the lightning cable is a little faster than the network connection that can be optionally enabled in XCode, and every little bit of speed helps with iterative build/test cycles because they really add up. So I'm just wondering if it is safe to assume if cabled app installation will speed up over the iPhone 15's 10Gbps USB 3.0 connector, compared to lightning, or if the app upload/install bottleneck is elsewhere?
 
For whatever it's worth, I asked ChatGPT for input on this. This is the output. Note: The CPU of the A17 chip is 10% faster, which means that two potential bottlenecks for app upload and install have been reduced. It will be interesting to see how that turns out, since my app is pretty big.

-----


The speed at which apps are installed onto an iPhone via Xcode can be influenced by various factors, and the connection type (Lightning vs. USB 3.0) is certainly one of them. Here's a breakdown of your scenario:

  1. Transfer Speeds: The difference between 480 Mbps (Lightning's USB 2.0 speeds) and 10 Gbps (USB 3.0) is substantial. That's roughly a 20-fold increase in raw data transfer speeds, assuming the 10 Gbps of USB 3.0 is fully utilized. This difference alone could lead to much faster data transfer times when sending large apps or files to your iPhone.
  2. Bottlenecks: While the connection speed is crucial, it isn't the only factor. The actual bottleneck could be elsewhere, such as:
    • Disk speeds: If the read speed from the Mac's storage is slow.
    • App installation: Transferring the app is just one part; the iPhone then has to install it. Depending on the complexity and size of the app, this could take some time.
    • Overhead from Xcode: Xcode might be doing other tasks behind the scenes, like code signing, provisioning profile checks, etc.
  3. Network Transfer: When you mention that the network connection is a bit slower, it's not surprising. Wi-Fi, even if it's fast, has more overhead and less consistency than a direct wired connection.
  4. Other Improvements: The iPhone 15 series, as a newer generation, likely has other improvements such as faster storage write speeds and more efficient software processing. This can further reduce the time it takes to install an app.
  5. Practical Expectation: Even though USB 3.0 has a theoretical 10 Gbps speed, real-world speeds are often lower due to various overheads and inefficiencies. However, it's still reasonable to expect a significant improvement over the older Lightning connection.
In summary, if Apple's iPhone 15 series has indeed switched to a USB 3.0 connection with 10 Gbps speeds, you can expect a noticeable improvement in transfer times from Xcode to the device. However, some other factors, like app installation time, may not be as dramatically improved solely due to the faster connection.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.