Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

sammich

macrumors 601
Sep 26, 2006
4,305
268
Sarcasmville.
The 'Retina' is just a trade name. At about 10" it'll satisfy the 'more pixels than the eye can pick up'. Your 1080p TV will probably satisfy this requirement at about 8'.

But resolution independence needs to be brought to OS X.

And the TV industry needs to as a whole, move past 1080p.
 

Hellhammer

Moderator emeritus
Dec 10, 2008
22,164
582
Finland
I doubt iPad will get a display with same ppi as that would need 3 times more pixels in iPad which would be about 1920x1080 i.e. INSANE! Possibly an improved display in next gen but not that high ppi though.

For laptops, it doesn't make sense as people are already complaining about small fonts and retina display would make reading impossible. Possibly along with OS X 10.7 if it supports resolution independence
 

danielcox

macrumors member
Apr 19, 2010
98
0
Yes and no - the 'retina display' is just a poor name for a high resolution small screen.
 

peakchua

macrumors regular
Apr 12, 2010
184
0
heheh lets hope the retina or something close to it makes the imac, apple display and the macbooks (pro, air book) imagine, an imac with 8802 pixels!!! wow imagine how the eye would see it and movies with BLU RAY! apple is on a roll... if this gets put into macs, then sjobs would have to design the apple tv monitor...... whew
 

GFLPraxis

macrumors 604
Mar 17, 2004
7,152
460
A high res screen will be found in competing phones. In fact, some were already farther along than Apple until iPhone 4 came out.

Let's be honest, though- Apple blew everyone away. The Nexus One managed to achieve an extremely impressive 800×480, but only by using the PenTile matrix to 'cheap' by eliminating some sub-pixels, so it's not truly at the same high pixels-per-inch ratio, as there are less green sub-pixels- and the screen is bigger, to boot.

The iPhone 4's screen completely demolishes anything else out there.
 

kdarling

macrumors P6
The Nexus One managed to achieve an extremely impressive 800×480, but only by using the PenTile matrix to 'cheap' by eliminating some sub-pixels, so it's not truly at the same high pixels-per-inch ratio, as there are less green sub-pixels- and the screen is bigger, to boot.

The whole point of Pentile is that it does away with the traditional notion of dedicated subpixels, since that model doesn't match the human eye.

The iPhone 4's screen completely demolishes anything else out there.

There are plenty of phones with 800x480 and more using full subpixels, if that's what you're after.

It also depends on what display you want. Some would rather have a 4" screen with 1024x480 than a 3" screen with a thousand x thousand pixels.
 

Abstract

macrumors Penryn
Dec 27, 2002
24,889
921
Location Location Location
Let's be honest, though- Apple blew everyone away.....

The iPhone 4's screen completely demolishes anything else out there.

And I'm not denying that, but it's probably more due to the quality of the screen and images rather than the high pixel count. It's not THAT far ahead in pixel count, but Apple probably didn't go the cheap route and went for quality as well.
 

Rodimus Prime

macrumors G4
Oct 9, 2006
10,136
4
It is safe to say with in a year most if not all will catch up to what the iPhone. Apple does not know the patent on that high dpi. The cost of those LCD panels are going to drop and the AMOLED will be getting there soon.

In the next 2 years part as normal apple is going to fall way behind. When the iPhone first came out it was great on the dpi and it was a very high end screen. Over the next few years it fell WAY WAY behind. It will be the same here.
 

Yamcha

macrumors 68000
Mar 6, 2008
1,855
249
I would love to see a retina display on the iMacs, I really hope that does happen :p.. I sit about 2 & 1/2 feet from the screen, now you can see some pixels, depending on what your looking at.. for example you do notice pixels on the minimize and maximize bubbles.. and cancel or ok buttons.. 1920X1080 is pretty good for 21.5", but i would be awesome to see a higher resolution on the same 21.5", the pixels would hardly be noticeable.. I don't know what an ideal resolution would be, but I'm sure Apple could figure that out..
 

RawBert

macrumors 68000
Jan 19, 2010
1,729
70
North Hollywood, CA
It will come to the iPad once Android/Chrome_OS tablets start beating it on specs. They've yet to release one that even compares. Or anything at all. So, it could be a while.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.