Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

macrumor2018

macrumors member
Original poster
Dec 19, 2018
63
43
I just got myself a USB 3.2 gen 2x2 SSD but can't take advantage of this spec with any of the latest Macs, even though they support USB-4 (or Thunderbolt 4 for that matter). Will this likely change in future years?
 

casperes1996

macrumors 604
Jan 26, 2014
7,599
5,770
Horsens, Denmark
What do you mean? USB4 is faster than, and a superset of, usb 3,2 2x2. The usb ports in all current Macs will run at full speed with usb 3,2. Assuming it’s either in a type C connector or you don’t use an adapter/converter/hub that itself is limited.
 

Miltz

macrumors 6502a
Sep 6, 2013
887
506
Unfortunately the most likely answer is no. The only way to get thunderbolt speeds using an external SSD on a Mac is getting a thunderbolt enclosure or just buying a thunderbolt SSD. There's plenty available. I would return what you bought and get a 1,000MB max USB or go full thunderbolt if you really need it. I have the crucial X9 Pro 4TB.
 

MRxROBOT

macrumors 6502a
Apr 14, 2016
779
806
01000011 01000001
What do you mean? USB4 is faster than, and a superset of, usb 3,2 2x2. The usb ports in all current Macs will run at full speed with usb 3,2. Assuming it’s either in a type C connector or you don’t use an adapter/converter/hub that itself is limited.
You're mistaken. No Mac will run USB 3.2 2x2 at full speed. If you plug a USB 3.2 2x2 SSD into a Mac it will only run at 10Gb, Only half of the specs capability.
 

casperes1996

macrumors 604
Jan 26, 2014
7,599
5,770
Horsens, Denmark
You're mistaken. No Mac will run USB 3.2 2x2 at full speed. If you plug a USB 3.2 2x2 SSD into a Mac it will only run at 10Gb, Only half of the specs capability.
I stand corrected. I was not aware 2x2 was still an optional spec in usb4. Thought it was a strict superset. Ignore prior comment
 

Fishrrman

macrumors Penryn
Feb 20, 2009
29,243
13,317
MRx explained:
"You're mistaken. No Mac will run USB 3.2 2x2 at full speed. If you plug a USB 3.2 2x2 SSD into a Mac it will only run at 10Gb, Only half of the specs capability."

Thanks for the clarification.

However...
If one connects a USB4 drive (using the appropriate cable), will the [theoretical] 40gb speed then be "halved" to, say, a maximum of around 20gb ??
 

MRxROBOT

macrumors 6502a
Apr 14, 2016
779
806
01000011 01000001
MRx explained:
"You're mistaken. No Mac will run USB 3.2 2x2 at full speed. If you plug a USB 3.2 2x2 SSD into a Mac it will only run at 10Gb, Only half of the specs capability."

Thanks for the clarification.

However...
If one connects a USB4 drive (using the appropriate cable), will the [theoretical] 40gb speed then be "halved" to, say, a maximum of around 20gb ??

I’m not quite understanding the question. I’ll answer it how I’m reading it. Are you asking why a USB4 drive may connect at 20Gbps? A USB 4 drive optionally comes in a 20Gbps flavor. You would need both a USB 4 drive and a USB 4 port on your computer to achieve that. However, If you connect a USB 3.2 2x2 drive (20Gbps) to a USB 4 port on a Mac it will only connect at 10Gbps.
 

Miltz

macrumors 6502a
Sep 6, 2013
887
506
To get anything over 1,000MB/s you need either a thunderbolt 3 or 4 drive, period.
 

Chancha

macrumors 68020
Mar 19, 2014
2,314
2,141
To get anything over 1,000MB/s you need either a thunderbolt 3 or 4 drive, period.
This already stopped being the case with the new ASMedia USB4 chip. A few USB4 NVMe enclosures are already available and people are getting >3000MB/s sequential to their Macs, no Thunderbolt involved.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Miltz and Fishrrman
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.