Idioteque said:I am in the market for a new imac, but the 1.86 core duo is kind of a turn off. With the MBP and MB already meeting these speeds, do you think we will se a imac quiet speed bump soon?
imacintel said:DUDE
The iMac intel Comes with A CoreDuo.Right. That 1.83 GhZ, IS PER CORE. If i add both of them together, you got yourself a speed of
Drumroll Please:
3.66 GHZ
Ther u go!
QCassidy352 said:Congratulations on posting one of the most confusing and useless responses I've seen in my 3+ years on this board. They are ALL core duos, so does that have to do with anything??![]()
Additionally, you can't just add the speeds of the cores and say it's the same as one 3.66 Ghz chip.
and IMO, it is likely that we'll see a speed bump to the imacs in the not too distant future.
BlizzardBomb said:It would seem logical, but maybe Apple wanted the MBP to look more "pro" than the iMac. Hopefully, Apple will put a Merom/Conroe in it ASAP. Come to think of it, the Mac Mini could do with a bump too.
zap2 said:Guys calm down! Not all the Macs need upgrades
The iMac still smokes the MacBook, it has a dedicated graphics cards, bigger and faser Hard Drive, bigger screen,more USB ports.. the iMac is better then the MacBook, the specs prove it. A small 170Mhz is not going to make a HUGE difference of speed(not to say it won't help)
zap2 said:Guys calm down! Not all the Macs need upgrades
The iMac still smokes the MacBook, it has a dedicated graphics cards, bigger and faser Hard Drive, bigger screen,more USB ports.. the iMac is better then the MacBook, the specs prove it. A small 170Mhz is not going to make a HUGE difference of speed(not to say it won't help)
zap2 said:Guys calm down! Not all the Macs need upgrades
The iMac still smokes the MacBook, it has a dedicated graphics cards, bigger and faser Hard Drive, bigger screen,more USB ports.. the iMac is better then the MacBook, the specs prove it. A small 170Mhz is not going to make a HUGE difference of speed(not to say it won't help)