Idioteque said:I am in the market for a new imac, but the 1.86 core duo is kind of a turn off. With the MBP and MB already meeting these speeds, do you think we will se a imac quiet speed bump soon?
imacintel said:DUDE
The iMac intel Comes with A CoreDuo.Right. That 1.83 GhZ, IS PER CORE. If i add both of them together, you got yourself a speed of
Drumroll Please:
3.66 GHZ
Ther u go!
QCassidy352 said:Congratulations on posting one of the most confusing and useless responses I've seen in my 3+ years on this board. They are ALL core duos, so does that have to do with anything??
Additionally, you can't just add the speeds of the cores and say it's the same as one 3.66 Ghz chip.
and IMO, it is likely that we'll see a speed bump to the imacs in the not too distant future.
BlizzardBomb said:It would seem logical, but maybe Apple wanted the MBP to look more "pro" than the iMac. Hopefully, Apple will put a Merom/Conroe in it ASAP. Come to think of it, the Mac Mini could do with a bump too.
zap2 said:Guys calm down! Not all the Macs need upgrades
The iMac still smokes the MacBook, it has a dedicated graphics cards, bigger and faser Hard Drive, bigger screen,more USB ports.. the iMac is better then the MacBook, the specs prove it. A small 170Mhz is not going to make a HUGE difference of speed(not to say it won't help)
zap2 said:Guys calm down! Not all the Macs need upgrades
The iMac still smokes the MacBook, it has a dedicated graphics cards, bigger and faser Hard Drive, bigger screen,more USB ports.. the iMac is better then the MacBook, the specs prove it. A small 170Mhz is not going to make a HUGE difference of speed(not to say it won't help)
zap2 said:Guys calm down! Not all the Macs need upgrades
The iMac still smokes the MacBook, it has a dedicated graphics cards, bigger and faser Hard Drive, bigger screen,more USB ports.. the iMac is better then the MacBook, the specs prove it. A small 170Mhz is not going to make a HUGE difference of speed(not to say it won't help)