Here is my thinking. You guys are correct that the current iPad Pro is plenty fast but I would say its still not fast enough for some pro apps which need more horsepower. (now, lets not nitpick for a sec. please)
So, if Apple is going their own way with GPU and CPU in those A chips being done inhouse then we can assume that its only gonna get better and ahead of the competition (hopefully).
Now lets say you do sculpting in Zbrush or Mudbox and would love to pick up your iPad Pro and do some basic/advanced work which I think is totally achievable.
However, there are 2 issues here: 1) we need developer support - that means that in case of Zbrush (Pixologic) & Mudbox (Autodesk) we need them to make a version for iOS that would be serious enough that we could actually replace our machines for most tasks. (of course there will be "truck" users but thats not the discussion here)
2) we need the horsepower for those apps and in that case we need as many devices as possible to make it viable for the developers to go for it.
Its not just for sculpting. The same could be for animation, photo editing etc. At the moment, I kinda see that the horsepower is getting there but the app support is not. Ie. is there a serious app for photo editing?
So, iPhone 8 & X showed that the A11 is crazy fast chip so as someone mentioned A11X will be a beast due to the GPU being inhouse. So of course if someone is going to get iPad soon then its logical to wait as that will be really future proof for a long time.
In all honesty, I'm not really in a rush to get it this year. I was just wondering as it would be nice to play with it over xmas break but I can wait.
Regardless, iPads will most likely replace 99% of tasks in the future but right now its still not there and there is a long way to go.
And yeah, I would love to have Zbrush version for iOS. That would be amazing
