Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

etjazz

macrumors member
Original poster
Dec 13, 2006
33
4
I'm optimistic performance can be optimized to very useable levels. Obviously not bootcamp equivalent, but useable for legacy productivity software
 

Bearxor

macrumors 6502a
Jun 7, 2007
785
516
I'm optimistic performance can be optimized to very useable levels. Obviously not bootcamp equivalent, but useable for legacy productivity software
Yeah I’m not expecting gaming performance. That ship has sailed. But give me enough seed to run the office apps and a few other random utilities I’d need to run under Windows and I’ll be happy.
 

Nate Spencer

macrumors member
Jun 5, 2015
54
30
I have it running. Well crawling slowly is more like it. I put a kvm/qemu VM I have for some old VS2010 build system on. I didn't go out of my way to optimize GFX or CPU selection within x86_64. I set 2 core and 4GB of RAM. It took probably 6-8 min to get to desktop. My 2 cents is if you need Windows x86/x86-64 probably will want another solution. Crossover office might work for now for some applications. Full Windows is not likely practical. Granted this is running on Rosetta copy of qemu. Maybe a native ARM qemu will be more usable I doubt by much. RDP to another box might be best. YMMV.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2020-11-22 at 3.35.34 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2020-11-22 at 3.35.34 PM.png
    1.2 MB · Views: 698
  • Like
Reactions: etjazz

kjd2234

macrumors member
Nov 11, 2020
57
19
I have it running. Well crawling slowly is more like it. I put a kvm/qemu VM I have for some old VS2010 build system on. I didn't go out of my way to optimize GFX or CPU selection within x86_64. I set 2 core and 4GB of RAM. It took probably 6-8 min to get to desktop. My 2 cents is if you need Windows x86/x86-64 probably will want another solution. Crossover office might work for now for some applications. Full Windows is not likely practical. Granted this is running on Rosetta copy of qemu. Maybe a native ARM qemu will be more usable I doubt by much. RDP to another box might be best. YMMV.
Thanks for sharing your experience! I am wondering, have you experimented with other virtualization, such as Linux?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nate Spencer

Nate Spencer

macrumors member
Jun 5, 2015
54
30
Thanks for sharing your experience! I am wondering, have you experimented with other virtualization, such as Linux?
I will be testing that after bit. I have an older Ubuntu img file on the archive store. I had a prefabbed VM for qemu easily accessible of Win7. If the patches for native apple silicon QEMU or someone links to binary of it. I'd be happy to test again.
 

etjazz

macrumors member
Original poster
Dec 13, 2006
33
4
I set 2 core and 4GB of RAM. It took probably 6-8 min to get to desktop


that is slower than utmapp on an iPad Pro, so definitely some room for improvement!


Many thanks for your testing, I’m still waiting for my M1 air to arrive
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nate Spencer

JamesBerry

macrumors member
Jan 6, 2009
82
29
I believe utmapp can now run on macOS (saw something in their discord about a build). I don't have a apple silicon machine to try yet...
 

hugodrax

macrumors 65816
Jul 15, 2007
1,225
640
His activity monitor screen is interesting. He’s using 391% of cpu and 0 percent of GPU.
The emulator is not sending the windowing/screen to the GPU so it has to do all the work of drawing,bitblit,moving megabits of screen around 60 times a second.

once they come out with an emulator that uses metal you will see a huge difference in performance.
 

tdar

macrumors 68020
Jun 23, 2003
2,102
2,522
Johns Creek Ga.
View attachment 1681959 Geekbench 5 score in Windows for arm on M1
So to put these scores in context, even on a unoptimized VM, we are seeing single core spreads that are faster than any other Mac that doesn’t have M1.
And multi core that when optimized will be within shouting distance from a 12 core Mac Pro. If it doesn’t beat it.
That’s not bad.
Hard to believe but that is probably the fastest windows for arm system in the world- at least in the hands of customers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gank41

gank41

macrumors 601
Mar 25, 2008
4,353
5,022
This is all extremely promising, considering there’s been no official word from Microsoft directly about any of this. If some folks can manage to get Windows working, albeit not ideal performance wise, just imagine what Microsoft will do. I mean, they make a lot of money off of licensing! They’re not going to want to give that up. And I’m sure they’ve only just begun testing. The future is bright.
 

dhazeghi

macrumors member
Nov 2, 2006
89
25
I have it running. Well crawling slowly is more like it. I put a kvm/qemu VM I have for some old VS2010 build system on. I didn't go out of my way to optimize GFX or CPU selection within x86_64. I set 2 core and 4GB of RAM. It took probably 6-8 min to get to desktop. My 2 cents is if you need Windows x86/x86-64 probably will want another solution. Crossover office might work for now for some applications. Full Windows is not likely practical. Granted this is running on Rosetta copy of qemu. Maybe a native ARM qemu will be more usable I doubt by much. RDP to another box might be best. YMMV.

That's not very encouraging. Any thoughts as to whether this is Windows 10-specific, i.e. will performance for Windows 7 or MacOS X 10.6 be more usable? I have a bunch of VMs used for compatibility with older software (PowerPC Mac and early Windows items) and it would be a bitter pill to lose all of that.
 

Jouls

macrumors member
Aug 8, 2020
89
57
There is already an extensive thread regarding windows on M1:

EDIT: ah, ok it’s about Windows on Arm in the mentioned thread. Sorry.
 

Nate Spencer

macrumors member
Jun 5, 2015
54
30
That's not very encouraging. Any thoughts as to whether this is Windows 10-specific, i.e. will performance for Windows 7 or MacOS X 10.6 be more usable? I have a bunch of VMs used for compatibility with older software (PowerPC Mac and early Windows items) and it would be a bitter pill to lose all of that.
Running the insider's version of ARM Windows 10 seems to do much better. It runs win32 an win64 pretty well like a Rosetta. That seems to be the way. Hopefully, MS will allow retail sale or partnered w/ Parallels or the like. Full system emulation just isn't practical.
 

dhazeghi

macrumors member
Nov 2, 2006
89
25
There is already an extensive thread regarding windows on M1:

EDIT: ah, ok it’s about Windows on Arm in the mentioned thread. Sorry.
Yeah, it's a solution for some Windows applications, but from what I can see, Windows XP Mode cannot be added to Windows on ARM (makes sense - it's an x86 virtual machine that runs inside Windows 7 although a few people seem to have gotten it to work on Windows 10 x64 too).
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.