Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

fpbecker

macrumors member
Original poster
Sep 3, 2008
48
0
Frankfurt, Germany
With the ailing global economy, I am looking at ways I get better value for my money. One way I can do this if I need to replace a computer is by avoiding the “Apple Tax.”

Microsoft sponsored a new whitepaper (PDF) from Roger Kay of Endpoint Technologies Associates which takes a look at the tax from a tech analyst’s viewpoint. His paper shows the “Apple Tax” is the combination of what people pay up front when purchasing a Mac and what people pay over the life of their computer – the hidden tax.

Roger looked into both aspects in his whitepaper, and has discovered some interesting findings around the “hidden tax” of owning a Mac – using the scenario of a hypothetical family of 4 and their costs over a five year period. Knowing that Tax Day is just around the corner here in the US (April 15), I decided to have a little fun with his findings by building a mock up tax form using Roger’s numbers that show the whopping difference this family would get purchasing Windows PCs over Macs: $3,367.

Read the rest of the article on the Windows Experience Blog.

Whoa. What's with Microsoft being this aggressive towards Apple and the 'Apple Tax' lately? And: When and how will Apple respond?
 

NT1440

macrumors Pentium
May 18, 2008
15,093
22,159
Why does it factor in the cost of software to put on a mac (office amongst others) but doesn't say a damn thing on the cost of software to put on a pc?:confused:
 

r.j.s

Moderator emeritus
Mar 7, 2007
15,026
52
Texas
Why does it factor in the cost of software to put on a mac (office amongst others) but doesn't say a damn thing on the cost of software to put on a pc?:confused:

Because the paper was sponsored by MS.

I love how you MUST get One to One and 5 years of MobileMe.

Why is an iLife upgrade on there?
 

Raid

macrumors 68020
Feb 18, 2003
2,155
4,588
Toronto
^^ I noticed that, and that the option for sony blu-ray drive is more expensive for the Mac. ... and what about equivalent options for Mobileme for the PC

:rolleyes:

Sigh, I for one wouldn't mind a non-biased evaluation, but I'm not going to hold my breath for it.
 

r.j.s

Moderator emeritus
Mar 7, 2007
15,026
52
Texas
And why is the same GPU different prices?

WTF is Other Software for $70?
 

175170

Cancelled
Mar 28, 2008
964
0
I've decided.
Is there anybody who can get me a text version of this?
I'm going to go through it, and then write a paper arguing against it.
A five page report!
 

175170

Cancelled
Mar 28, 2008
964
0
I just discovered that I can copy and paste. Expect a report/essay soon.
 

175170

Cancelled
Mar 28, 2008
964
0
What I have so far

What Price Mainstream?
Users may know they pay less for PC hardware, but much of the “Microsoft Tax” is hidden.




















By David Hsu


Sponsor: None








Introduction: I took the one less traveled by, And that has made all the difference
Two major competitors have emerged from the pack: Mac and PC. They are radically different, and diverge in profound and philosophical ways.
With respect to operating systems, the question of price has to be looked at. Microsoft and Apple have taken significantly different approaches to building a Platform. Microsoft worked with partners to provide a greater range of choice, while Apple took care of the whole Platform, providing a significantly more integrated, albeit less flexible Platform.
An outgrowth of Apple’s strategy is Apple’s pricing, and luxurious Platform experiences. For Microsoft, it is flexibility, at the cost of malicious software.
 

*LTD*

macrumors G4
Feb 5, 2009
10,703
1
Canada
The value of Windows? What value??

Is it the value of:

Running antivirus software
Slowdowns over time
Regular maintenance
A slipshod UI
Poorly integrated software
Messy interface
Badly designed software
A massive target for virus writers
Conficker (which is now awake, have fun Winblows zombies! (Again))
Hardware/software compatibility issues
The worst browser in history, fully integrated into the OS (Bonus!)
HIG guidelines that are hardly ever followed
An OS that so obviously tries to be an ass-backwards, upside down clone of OS X
Running Crysis faster than the other basement shut-in living next door
And . . .

The happy knowledge that you come off looking cheap, and worse, a loser that secretly lusts after OS X . . . mostly because MS said so in their ads.

Lots of value there. I'd pay extra (a lot extra) just to avoid all of that.
 

Fontaine

macrumors newbie
Apr 9, 2009
1
0
And people seriously wonder why you where banned from Neowin posting rubbish like that. Apart from having to install A/V software I have never ran into any of those other problems, and I have been using Windows for years. Is my PC magic or something?

The happy knowledge that you come off looking cheap, and worse, a loser that secretly lusts after OS X . . . mostly because MS said so in their ads

You assume every user wants to use OSX? Funny, looking at OSX personally makes me feel like vomiting.
 

IJ Reilly

macrumors P6
Jul 16, 2002
17,909
1,496
Palookaville
In recessions, people eat out just about as often as during better times, but they tend to eat fast food instead of going to good restaurants -- not necessarily because they can't afford the better restaurant, but because they're afraid for their own futures and at least pretend to spend a little less. So here is Microsoft trying desperately to capitalize on the fear consumers typically experience in recessions. It's a completely negative strategy, which even if it succeeds marginally, will look ridiculous when the economy improves.

This is a classic Microsoft tactic. They've always been better at motivating people through fear than desire. Old habits are hard to break.
 

barkmonster

macrumors 68020
Dec 3, 2001
2,134
15
Lancashire
Here's an Apple response I'd like to see...

:d
 

Attachments

  • stupid-apple-poster.jpg
    stupid-apple-poster.jpg
    22.6 KB · Views: 131

Pandya

macrumors newbie
Apr 9, 2009
2
0
Actually this is more like it:

MS tax
http://blogs.zdnet.com/storage/?p=442

You'd think that given how easy it is to discredit the MS-sponsored white paper, it won't take long to do the same to ZDNet. After all, fair is fair.

First of all, it should be pointed out that while Microsoft are making a higher margin, it isn't respective of a higher per unit cost - as the article states, profit margins are simply revenue less costs...Microsoft's vastly higher gross margins is respective of lower costs and higher revenue (volume as much as per-unit price). It doesn't mean these costs are at all passed on to consumers as 'tax' -besides reduced costs and increase volume, Microsoft make some dizzyingly expensive enterprise software.

The ZDNet article also makes an interesting notion that the Zune is crushed by Apple...it wouldn't be fair to say Apple is crushed by Microsoft (just outperformed in sales)...it occupies a smaller, but steady volume of sales. Again, the Xbox 360 isn't crushed by the Wii, and similarly, Vista isn't crushed by XP (and even if it did, the money ends up in the same pocket, so it isn't really a major concern for Microsoft's financial health).

Equally, the resale numbers are mis-represented - Apple products cost more in the first place, and have a smaller volume, so when it comes to resale, their resale is in line with their original retail price. Whilst the percentages may favour Apple for retaining value, in the example given, a $1200 Macbook losing 50% value is then worth $600...the $600 Dell losing 80% value is then worth $120...losing $480 in value. The loss is higher with the Apple product, and the lower cost of the Dell makes it more easily replaced.

The finishing comment is flawed...it makes the assumption that Ballmer is suggesting consumers settle for an inferior product due to cost...cost does not represent value.
 

ravenvii

macrumors 604
Mar 17, 2004
7,585
493
Melenkurion Skyweir
You assume every user wants to use OSX? Funny, looking at OSX personally makes me feel like vomiting.

Really? Then your keyboard and desk (and perhaps your screen) must be just utterly disgusting, since you bothered to come here, register, and post. OS X is all over the place here - it's a Mac site after all.

Hope you have a coherent explanation to your mommy and daddy for why you became anorexic.
 

clevin

macrumors G3
Aug 6, 2006
9,095
1
Why does it factor in the cost of software to put on a mac (office amongst others) but doesn't say a damn thing on the cost of software to put on a pc?:confused:
good point, maybe everybody is pirating on windows......
 

Eidorian

macrumors Penryn
Mar 23, 2005
29,190
386
Indianapolis
I have to say that the value of Windows is the choice of your hardware. It lacks polish in the UI and layout environment otherwise.
 

clevin

macrumors G3
Aug 6, 2006
9,095
1
I have to say that the value of Windows is the choice of your hardware. It lacks polish in the UI and layout environment otherwise.
I think Vista and windows 7 is polished enough, as far as UI is concerned. "Polish" in this regard is such a subjective "feelings", which has no standard to measure comprehensively.
 

surferfromuk

macrumors 65816
Feb 1, 2007
1,153
0
What about the Microsoft Tax? - a clear 50% wastage of ALL YOUR FREE TIME trying to get stuff done with their products.
 

chaos86

macrumors 65816
Sep 11, 2003
1,006
7
127.0.0.1
The only apple tax is on the hardware. Apple's update cycle is much slower, so right after each update the hardware costs roughly the same as a dell, but months later it's the same cost after the dell's price has fallen or it's been updated.

The rest is just MS BS. iLife upgrade? .Mac for 5 years? One-on-One care? Why does a mac user need quicken and office, but a PC user doesn't need anything? No video software, no AV software, nothing?

This "whitepaper" is called a white paper because it's printed on white paper. That's it's most credible feature.
 

synth3tik

macrumors 68040
Oct 11, 2006
3,951
2
Minneapolis, MN
You'll spend the money either way you go. Chances are with Apple you'll be giving them the money instead of a third party, but having experience with both over long periods of time, and you are spending pretty much the same.


Apple has a good business model that GETS us to continue spending with Apple. For instance the iTMS. Using Apples applications to purchase stuff from Apple, that is genius. MS has somewhat tried with that, but the store is just the face of what Apple has down, and all of what MS has done.
 

Melrose

Suspended
Dec 12, 2007
7,806
399
I can't believe he even registered just to post something like this...

The term whitepaper is very subjective. It's supposed to mean a fact-based document that proves a point or otherwise makes a logical statement based on points of reasoning or comparisons.

That said, I don't understand how a company expects to pass off something like this as factual, when they are one of the parties involved - talk about bias.

What's even more amazing is that there are shallow-minded people who read that and then believe it. Microsoft fills their customers' minds with garbage like this, it's no wonder the PC users I've personally discussed things like this with are clueless and uninformed.
 

Eidorian

macrumors Penryn
Mar 23, 2005
29,190
386
Indianapolis
I think Vista and windows 7 is polished enough, as far as UI is concerned. "Polish" in this regard is such a subjective "feelings", which has no standard to measure comprehensively.
My big problem is that within Vista itself you'll have applications with wildly differing layouts and button schemes. I had a picture at one point that pointed out all the different schemes with the bundled applications alone. It seemed like they didn't even try to stick with one predefined usability outline.

Menus or nonexistent menus. Help buttons or accessing help from the menu.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.