Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

wgilles

macrumors 6502
Feb 21, 2008
315
0
Not sure about Fusion, but there is no reason it shouldn't work for Bootcamp...strange though, I thought this wasn't going to come out for another couple months.
 

hodgjy

macrumors 6502
Apr 15, 2005
422
0
It's been RTM for about a month, and MS is allowing it to be manually downloaded now. They won't release it to Windows Update for several months, though.

strange though, I thought this wasn't going to come out for another couple months.
 

Daveoc64

macrumors 601
Jan 16, 2008
4,075
95
Bristol, UK
Installed in Boot Camp on the machine in my sig.

No problems, seems faster - but I didn't have any issues with Windows Vista anyway.

For the record, I've installed it on my Dell PC too and that seems fine.
 

steveza

macrumors 68000
Feb 20, 2008
1,521
27
UK
Had it on my Dell laptop since it was released to Technet subscribers (I think it was 2 months ago) and haven't had any problems. Some blogs posted at the time suggested that if you have speed issues with Vista a full reinstall with a slipstreamed DVD of Vista SP1 is the best option.

I use Windows Server 2008 SP1 in Fusion and it works without any problems. Better than Vista actually.
 

11800506

macrumors 65816
Oct 31, 2007
1,060
1
Washington D.C. Area
Does anyone know if MS released Vista SP1 x64? Because I can't seem to find it on their website.

EDIT: Never mind, I found it by doing a search for "Windows Vista Service Pack 1 Five Language Standalone" and it came up with both options.
 

XianPalin

macrumors 6502
May 26, 2006
297
11
Bit the bullet

I went ahead and installed Vista SP1 (x64) on Vista Ultimate 64-bit on a 2008 Mac Pro... everything worked fine, took a while but no problems. Haven't tried starting it up under Fusion / OS X yet, but running in boot camp now and no problems.

Edit: Everything worked fine under Vmware Fusion as well.
 

Eidorian

macrumors Penryn
Mar 23, 2005
29,190
386
Indianapolis
I might consider Vista when it hits SP 2 but Windows 7 might be out by then. :rolleyes:

Come on down Windows XP Service Pack 3.
 

webgoat

macrumors 6502a
Sep 20, 2007
592
0
Austin, TX
It's been RTM for about a month, and MS is allowing it to be manually downloaded now. They won't release it to Windows Update for several months, though.

i just got it through windows update

on a side note at least it recognizes i have 4 gb of ram now although no clue if it is able to use it all
 

Attachments

  • vista sp1.jpg
    vista sp1.jpg
    46.3 KB · Views: 123

Chocomonsters

macrumors regular
May 22, 2007
166
45
Vista SP1 (x86) is still limited by 4 GB. It will now show you actual memory on your system but amount of memory your system will use is same. Microsoft decided to report the total memory on your computer under "system", not user useable memory like pre-SP1.

Windows Task Manager's performance tab will still show you same memory limitation as before.
 

wgilles

macrumors 6502
Feb 21, 2008
315
0
i just got it through windows update

on a side note at least it recognizes i have 4 gb of ram now although no clue if it is able to use it all

That's pretty interesting...I didn't think this was possible...I still wonder if it is using it at all.
 

wkw

macrumors 6502
Mar 23, 2004
312
31
Eugene, OR
yeah I checked task mgr/performance and it shows the system using only 3gb. I have 4gb installed on my 24" alum imac. running 32bit home premium sp1. why won't it use all 4gb?
 

steveza

macrumors 68000
Feb 20, 2008
1,521
27
UK
yeah I checked task mgr/performance and it shows the system using only 3gb. I have 4gb installed on my 24" alum imac. running 32bit home premium sp1. why won't it use all 4gb?
It's a 32bit limitation. If you have a legal retail (boxed) version of Vista then you can get the x64 version instead.
 

wgilles

macrumors 6502
Feb 21, 2008
315
0
It's a 32bit limitation. If you have a legal retail (boxed) version of Vista then you can get the x64 version instead.

Be aware, Vista 64 drivers only work with new MBPs and Mac Pros as of right now.
 

hob

macrumors 68010
Oct 4, 2003
2,004
0
London, UK
SP1 sparked my interest in Vista, and I re-loaded my free MSDN uni copy onto my MacBook.

It's not as bad as everyone says, once you turn all the new "features" off! rendering it like Win2k just with search features...

I quite like the new folder icons... they seem cool! (the way it shows you the contents etc.)
 

yomibro

macrumors regular
Feb 24, 2008
220
7
Installed SP1 last night under Bootcamp and so far no issues, I have to say that Vista runs snappier right now compared to before. Just as a side note I had to re-activate Vista again after the SP1 install.

Went back to OSX and brought up Fusion, no issues as far as I could tell after a few hours of doing work.
 

Bern

macrumors 68000
Nov 10, 2004
1,854
1
Australia
Just a question about Vista and the possible result of SP1...

My friend use to have Vista installed (went back to XP) but the fans on his Mac kicked in fairly often. Has SP1 made a positive impact on system resources?
 

dgdosen

macrumors 68030
Dec 13, 2003
2,817
1,463
Seattle
I've been using SP1 for about a month. It might be a bit better in terms of resources, but I swear Vista chews up battery time much faster than leopard - and that's with the machine just sitting there. I think Aero is a big culprit for keeping that processor revved up...

If you keep it plugged in... It's great!
 

mkrad

macrumors member
Feb 14, 2008
59
0
Midwest, USA
Won't apply to Vista 32 VM under Parallels. Get install error every time - recommends the usual suspects, e.g. restart, redownload, etc., mebbe I'll just wait til it loads from windows update, just seems a little too not ready for prime time at this point...
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.