Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

dr.devious

macrumors regular
Original poster
Nov 30, 2008
206
56
Truckee Meadows, NV
I won a $400 AMEX Gift Card through work and now I am debating whether I should use it to buy a lens or a netbook...

I have a Canon XS with the kit lens and a 75-300mm
 

leighonigar

macrumors 6502a
May 5, 2007
908
1
A rather personal question - Do you already have a laptop? Do you find yourself needing other lenses?
 

leighonigar

macrumors 6502a
May 5, 2007
908
1
Of course it's a personal question - it depends entirely on circumstance.

I myself would get a lens, as I have a netbook and I don't use it that much.
 

Abstract

macrumors Penryn
Dec 27, 2002
24,870
902
Location Location Location
You have a good laptop and crappy lenses. Get a lens. ;) The Tamron you linked to would be OK. The Sigma 24-70 mm f/2.8 is also very nice because you can shoot wider. I'd recommend the new model just because it's smaller than the old one, although the old one was pretty decent.
 

jbernie

macrumors 6502a
Nov 25, 2005
927
12
Denver, CO
In a very general sense I would say the lens would be more valuable/useful to you than the netbook. Though your personal needs may dictate otherwise.

Though keep in mind that those Amex giftcards probably dont have an expiration on them so maybe you can hold off for a few months and see if you can add some cash to expand the options. If nothing else, you should be able to get through to the next Canon sale without losing any value.
 

toxic

macrumors 68000
Nov 9, 2008
1,664
1
Sigma 17-70mm. or if you don't care for the wide end, get rid of the lens you have now and grab a 70-200 f/4.
 

cube

Suspended
May 10, 2004
17,011
4,973
The first Athlon NEO ultraportable just came out. Netbooks are in a state of flux.
 

jaseone

macrumors 65816
Nov 7, 2004
1,245
57
Houston, USA
Netbooks aren't really that useful for people that already have a laptop, especially a Macbook or Macbook Pro as the portability isn't that much improved with a netbook. The only real reason I see to get a netbook is if you want something cheaper that you can take places you wouldn't take your Macbook but even then ~$400 is still a lot to risk in such situations.

Netbooks are best for those that either don't have a computer at all or only have a desktop or have an aging clunky laptop.

With that being said if Apple does release a netbook or similar then I will probably still by that but no way is that going to be under $400 so I say go with the lens!
 

147798

Suspended
Dec 29, 2007
1,047
219
But don't bother with the 50/1.8. If you have $400 you want to spend, get a better lens. So of the other ones mentioned would fit the bill. Or some good primes. I love my Canon 35/2 and Sigma makes a good 30/1.4
 

103734

Guest
Apr 10, 2007
723
0
Depends, for me I just got a netbook, I could have got a lens but I am really loving the netbook, I got a dell mini 9 from dell on the one day sale day for 180 something and put 2gb of ram and a 8gb sd card for storage, I put a few old games on it like rollercoaster tycoon 1 and 2, sims, sim city, a few emulators, and Microsoft Word, oh and I forgot to mention I loaded it up with windows 7.

I really love it, I get about 3:30 hours with win 7 and it runs very fast, maybe faster than XP, and its alot easier to carry around campus than my unibody mb pro. And if I drop it it won't be more than $200 to fix, you cant say the same thing about the macbook.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.