I'd buy an iPad that has retina on one side and e-ink on the other, if it could be used for all apps, including Kindle. Apple would clean up with this, especially if both iPad and iPhone sizes had it. I know this already exists but I want it on IOS devices.
Or, how about the smart cover acting as an e-ink display for Apps that could support it. It could be removable and maybe cache books/webpages. Surely that's the future?
As long as the hypothetical Apple e-ink reader supports non-DRMed epub like iBooks already does, I don't see much of an issue. You can still buy from almost any source, disinfect via Calibre and convert to epub (if it's not already in that format).I would be unlikely to buy one because although I love Apple products, I like to liberate my books, so would probably stick with my Kobo and buy from wherever I like.
I would be unlikely to buy one because although I love Apple products, I like to liberate my books, so would probably stick with my Kobo and buy from wherever I like.
iBooks collections and page syncing actually work better than Kindle for sideloaded content. There's plenty of room for improvement on the Kindle (and other e-ink readers for that matter). So far, the best firmware I've used on an e-ink reader is the PRS+ custom firmware for Sony's older PRS line of e-ink readers. Only reason I switched to a Kindle Paperwhite was for wifi support and front lighting.I can't see any advantage in an Apple-branded e-ink reader. It'd be just "yet-another-ebook-ecosystem". A field where Apple isn't even particularly good in, at the moment.
iBooks collections and page syncing actually work better than Kindle for sideloaded content. There's plenty of room for improvement on the Kindle (and other e-ink readers for that matter). So far, the best firmware I've used on an e-ink reader is the PRS+ custom firmware for Sony's older PRS line of e-ink readers. Only reason I switched to a Kindle Paperwhite was for wifi support and front lighting.
Granted, it would be better if existing players like Amazon, Barnes & Noble and Kobo improved their offerings rather than have yet another player enter the market. You would think choice is good, unfortunately competing DRM formats just makes it one huge headache for the non-technically inclined. If not for DRM, this would be a non-issue. I disinfect my ebooks so I can buy from practically any store and use them on any reader. Alas, not everyone is aware you can even do that (plus it's a legal gray area).
I'd buy an iPad that has retina on one side and e-ink on the other,
Pretty much this. It would mean I'd be locked into buying books from iBooks. I prefer to buy my books from Amazon, if only for the fact that they are usually cheaper.Nope. Because given the choice between iBooks and Amazon, I'll take Amazon. While neither is platform agnostic, Kindle is closer, with apps that can be used on a wider variety of devices (without stripping DRM). Plus, Apple would likely charge 3x as much for their device.
I love my rMini even more than my iPhones (past and current). They'll do for reading in a pinch. But for real reading, I'll stick with my Paperwhite.
(And you couldn't pay me to take a Nook. They've tried several times to discontinue it entirely, so I have zero faith that it's a product line they'll continue indefinitely. Their customer service for the product is notorously rotten. And very frequently, B&N ebooks are a third higher in price than their Amazon equivalents. Yeah, no thanks.)