Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

matthewr

macrumors member
Original poster
Jun 17, 2004
82
0
I'm contemplating a new camera-related purchase, and I am trying to decide between upgrading from a D70 to a D90, or expanding my focal length range by getting the Nikon 12-24 lens. I do a combination of wildlife (mainly birds) and landscape photography (along with the requisite pictures of my kids). My current gear is a D70, a Nikkor 20-85 f2.8-4 and a Nikkor 80-400 f 4.5-5.6 VR. I'm somewhat torn, because I like the idea of a nice wide lens (and I no longer have that with the DX sensor) for landscapes, but I also like the idea of the increased resolution of the CMOS sensor. I'd be curious to know what others think the better purchase would be.

Thanks in advance,

Matthew

p.s. I know the real answer is to get both, that's not in the budget now...
 

ChrisA

macrumors G5
Jan 5, 2006
12,832
2,034
Redondo Beach, California
but I also like the idea of the increased resolution of the CMOS sensor. I'd be curious to know what others think the better purchase would be.

Think about dots per inch and not the total number of pixels. When you double the number of megapixels you gain only only about 40% more resolution. So if your D70 could make 10 inch wide prints a 12MP camera could make 14 inch wide prints. What are those extra 4 inches worth to you? The D90 might be worth it but not for the extra pixels. For those few times when you want to make a really large print, shoot film I've found that agfa 160 portrait film will scan to 24MP file size before you run into film grain and lens resolution limits. 24MP goes to about a 20" wide print
 

OreoCookie

macrumors 68030
Apr 14, 2001
2,727
90
Sendai, Japan
I would say neither: get a Tokina 12-24 f/4 whose optics is at least as good as the Nikkor (and has better built quality) and save the money towards a new body. This lens has just been superseded by the 11-16 f/2.8, so it should be cheaper than before.

There is no need to upgrade your body because of sensor resolution. The big advantages of the D90 are the much larger viewfinder (which the D80 already has) and the new sensor (which produces cleaner and better photos even at higher ISO).

The most important thing which limits your creative freedom is the lens, though. Glass lasts much longer than a body, especially if you put it in a tough package :)
 

matthewr

macrumors member
Original poster
Jun 17, 2004
82
0
Thanks!

Thanks for your input Chris and Oreo - I not decided yet, but am leaning towards the lens right now (I have missed the wide field of view quite a bit). Hearing other people's perspectives is always useful and appreciated.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.