Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

tuc

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Aug 25, 2003
333
67
I see that barefeats has benched the X3100 graphics in the macbook at roughly twice as fast as GMA 950. (I suppose new drivers could change this.)

I'm curious about other differences between X3100 and GMA 950.

Does the macbook underclock the X3100 as it did with the GMA 950?

Does the X3100 macbook support higher resolutions on external monitors?

Enquiring minds want to know.
 
Bare feats puts the benches up, I knew it wasnt pretty but a few more frames is better then nothing. I wonder how long it will be until Mini gets it that is if they dont lill it off. Its better then I anticipated but not by much.
 
I wonder how long it will be until Mini gets it

Soon, I hope, as I'm itching to buy a couple.

As I understand it, the Mini runs its GMA 950 at 400MHz while the MacBook runs its GMA 950 at 350MHz. I wonder if this changes with X3100.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.