Xbench result on iMac: Crappy

[imacintel]

I am using a base model iMac, and it has seemd to perform rather crappy in the XBench test, getting only 52 out of 100. I sort of exppected a little better, even for a middle of the line Mac. Whatever your computer, posts your results here. Also, tell why it could be crappy like this.

 

[Dont Hurt Me]

you should post your machines specs, also Xbench aint all that.

 

[livingfortoday]

XBench is notorious for being a terrible benchmarking program. I would not trust its results at all.

 

[imacintel]

you should post your machines specs, also Xbench aint all that.

I said it is an iMac base model, meaning it is a stock 1.83, 512,160GB!

 

[imacintel]

XBench is notorious for being a terrible benchmarking program. I would not trust its results at all.

Good benchmarking program you suggest?

 

[iGary]

Good benchmarking program you suggest?

Cinebench.

 

[imacintel]

Cinebench.

Thanks iGary!

 

[LastLine]

I said it is an iMac base model, meaning it is a stock 1.83, 512,160GB!

Which by no means means it's an Intel model Intel weren't the first iMac's and it would be wrong to assume so.

 

[imacintel]

Which by no means means it's an Intel model Intel weren't the first iMac's and it would be wrong to assume so.

Sorry. It is intel. However my signature and userneme do reveal a lot!

 

[plinden]

I am using a base model iMac, and it has seemd to perform rather crappy in the XBench test, getting only 52 out of 100. I sort of exppected a little better, even for a middle of the line Mac. Whatever your computer, posts your results here. Also, tell why it could be crappy like this.

Read this thread: https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/181325/

 

[Dont Hurt Me]

Sorry. It is intel. However my signature and userneme do reveal a lot!

Your signature tells nothing hot shot, and Apple has made iMacs longer then it appears you have been using them!