Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
XP specs vs OSX specs... Whats the deal?
- Thread starter djhspawn
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Just waiting on my own 4GB to arrive today. I was told that 32-bit Vista will address up to 3GB of RAM. Is it different for 32-bit Vista and XP then? Or did I get that 3GB wrong?
You learn something new every day.
Hmm, not sure. I have an extra GB (will take me to 3) on its way but I expect it won't arrive until the new year.
Is this via bootcamp or parallels? If so, I thought parallels was limited to 2GB.
As for bootcamp, I'd guess it should be just like vista32 bit native which should see 3.x GB RAM.
As for bootcamp, I'd guess it should be just like vista32 bit native which should see 3.x GB RAM.
It's a different story for 64-bit operating systems on hardware with capable memory addressing.
32 bit XP should display about 3.3gb RAM in optimal situations. Something looks to be fishy there. Do you have some heavy-duty system devices (pci cards for music, fast video cards etc) that might be clogging up the 32 bit address space?
Strange
There might be more to your issue than the 32-bit deal - I have 3gb on my MBP and Windows recognizes it fine. I wish I had an SR laptop though - I would love the full 4.
There might be more to your issue than the 32-bit deal - I have 3gb on my MBP and Windows recognizes it fine. I wish I had an SR laptop though - I would love the full 4.
There's nothing wrong. Windows XP 32 bit is limited to addressing only 4GB of memory. This doesn't mean that it will see all 4GB of RAM in your computer. Graphics cards, other PCI cards with built-in memory, and the page file (or whatever the virtual memory is called) are all included in that 4GB.
So at the end of the day, Windows only has enough addressing space left for roughly 2GB in your case.
So at the end of the day, Windows only has enough addressing space left for roughly 2GB in your case.
This is incorrect. The page file is not included in this. The figure quoted in the system properties on XP/Vista/etc is only the physical memory (RAM) in the PC (or virtual PC).
More on virtual memory (page file): link.
This is incorrect. The page file is not included in this. The figure quoted in the system properties on XP/Vista/etc is only the physical memory (RAM) in the PC (or virtual PC).
More on virtual memory (page file): link.
Right, I know that the system properties is reporting the physical memory in use. I was just throwing the thought out there that some part of those 4GB (max for 32-bit windows) is reserved for the page file.
Since you seem to know enough about this, care to explain exactly what's using the rest of the address space?
http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/platform/server/PAE/PAEmem.mspx
"The maximum amount of memory that can be supported on Windows XP Professional is 4GB". So perhaps XP Home only supports 2gb even on wintels.
However, someone mentioned:
"32-Bit versions of Microsoft Windows XP Home and Windows XP Professional will not utilize more than 2GB of RAM on the Mac Pro. You must use a 64-bit version of Windows to utilize more than 2GB of memory on this system."
However at this time BootCamp does not have drivers for 64-bit windows.
If that's true that is a problem. If it's a problem it'll be time to write to
http://www.apple.com/feedback/
"The maximum amount of memory that can be supported on Windows XP Professional is 4GB". So perhaps XP Home only supports 2gb even on wintels.
However, someone mentioned:
"32-Bit versions of Microsoft Windows XP Home and Windows XP Professional will not utilize more than 2GB of RAM on the Mac Pro. You must use a 64-bit version of Windows to utilize more than 2GB of memory on this system."
However at this time BootCamp does not have drivers for 64-bit windows.
If that's true that is a problem. If it's a problem it'll be time to write to
http://www.apple.com/feedback/
I'm thinking that in bootcamp, you should be seeing roughly 3GB in XP or Vista (any of their 32bit flavours)
Sorry - I dont think I made myself clear. The page file is not "reserved". It is in fact a file on the hard disk and will not be reserved in any way from physical RAM (or the hard disk even which can cause issues if it needs to grow - but that's another story!
) I wasn't crapping on you or your post at all, I just wanted to ensure the OP received the correct info I am surprised to see that myself, I (like others here) also expected it to show as 3.3(ish) GB or 4GB. I've had 4GB in a PC and win32bit saw it as 3.3 or so in a machine at work. It should not only be seeing 2GB. But I dont know why so it's a bit of a mystery. However as some other posters have mentioned, this does seem to be a specific problem, not a general windows deficiency.
Last time I check 4*512=±2Gb...
http://www.arar93.dsl.pipex.com/mds975/Images/homer_simpson_doh_01.jpg
Last time I check 4*512=±2Gb...
That's the new math.
