Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

zolaman

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Jan 19, 2006
5
0
I've been lurking here for a while without ever posting and have learned quite a bit but I figured that it's time I ask a question or two.

So I am definitely purchasing a MacBook in the next week or so and have no intentions of waiting so please don't advise me to just 'wait until Rev B'. ^_^

Anyway, my question is, how much difference does the 100 mb 7200 rpm HD make in actual performance over the 100 mb 5400 rpm HD? Because I've set a pre-tax upper limit of $2200 (+/- $20), this means I can either get the 1.83 GHz model with 1 gig of ram and the 5400 rpm drive... Or the 1.67 GHz model with 1 gig of ram and the 7200 rpm drive (with student discount of course).

Basically, what would be the expected actual performance difference between a system with a slightly faster processor but slower HD and a system with a slightly slower processor but faster HD?

Being a grad student in mathematics, I hardly use any video and photo editing software at a full-time professional scale. But I do quite a bit of mpeg-4 and h264 encoding as somewhat of a hobby and enjoy a few old PC games (i.e. Starcraft).

That said, and penny-pinching not being an issue (between the two options mentioned above), which option would give me the better performance?

Many thanx in advance!!
 

NewbieNerd

macrumors 6502a
Sep 22, 2005
512
0
Chicago, IL
zolaman said:
Being a grad student in mathematics, I hardly use any video and photo editing software at a full-time professional scale. But I do quite a bit of mpeg-4 and h264 encoding as somewhat of a hobby and enjoy a few old PC games (i.e. Starcraft).

You mean you have time on the computer for something other than LaTeX? :p
 

sw1tcher

macrumors 603
Jan 6, 2004
6,030
21,871
If they're both the same $, I'd go with the faster machine.

I think the extra proc speed would be more helpful than a faster HDD, especially if you have to run programs under Rosetta.
 

Dr_Maybe

macrumors 6502
Sep 17, 2003
277
0
South America
The faster harddisk should make loading of native intel apps faster. Games will be faster with the faster CPU.

I would probably go for the faster CPU, since it is easier to upgrade the harddisk than the CPU later.
 

zolaman

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Jan 19, 2006
5
0
Thank you for all the responses.

Faster processor it is! Here's to hoping that they're not already 'sold out'.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.