Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

AxoNeuron

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Apr 22, 2012
1,251
855
The Left Coast
I put Yosemite on a retina MBP which is my secondary machine. It is very slow, even DP2. On Mavericks it was lightning fast. I have it on a secondary partition so I can revert back to Mavericks if necessary but I really wanted to start practice developing swift apps for OS X. Even when the only software I have running is system preferences, I get the spinning beach ball when I click on any option in system preferences.

Does anyone else have this same issue with the beta? Any potential suggestions? I 100% expected an issue like this to happen and I can revert back to Mavericks easily, but before I did I was wondering if any of you had found a solution.

EDIT: fixed. It was a program called "Parallels Access" causing the issue!
 
Last edited:

MaxPayne79

macrumors regular
Jun 11, 2014
182
1
well I can't help you with the BETA issue because Yosemite beta's don't exist yet so I'm not sure what you're installing there. But both Developer Previews that have been leaked work perfectly fine (speed wise) on my macbook air and pro.
 

Watabou

macrumors 68040
Feb 10, 2008
3,426
759
United States
It's not slow for me, also using a retina MBP. So far, with DP2, all the slowness I got with DP1 was been essentially fixed. I'm doing much better with memory too. Haven't gotten swapping yet for 2 days uptime, it was much worse with DP1.

Maybe you can try a reinstall?

Also in Applespeak DP == beta.

Apple calls build before a GM, a DP too. There's no release candidate, beta, alpha or anything like that. Unless people specifically mention the public beta, you should assume DP == beta.
 

omenatarhuri

macrumors 6502a
Feb 9, 2010
990
1,016
Actually I find it very fast to boot. Other than that I don't do much else than Xcode in Yosemite, so I can't say. Anyway I don't find it any slower than Mavericks. Using 2011 MBP with SSD and 4GB RAM.
 

AxoNeuron

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Apr 22, 2012
1,251
855
The Left Coast
Very good, I will hunt down whatever I installed on the system that is causing the issue. I think it might be Parallels Access, it seems to dramatically speed things up when I've closed it. The Developer Preview was very slow when Parallels access was running in the background even when it wasn't in use.
 

Asclepio

macrumors 6502a
Jul 11, 2011
718
315
The official list of the fastest OS X released from 2005-present :

1. Snow Leopard
2. Tiger
3. Leopard
4. Mountain Lion
5. Mavericks
6. Yosemite
7. Lion
 

Yakibomb

macrumors 6502
May 13, 2014
413
60
Cape Town
I'm actually really impressed with the DP's so far. Pretty fast and mostly stable on my end, I can pretty much use them as my everyday system
 

brand

Suspended
Oct 3, 2006
4,390
456
127.0.0.1
The official list of the fastest OS X released from 2005-present :

1. Snow Leopard
2. Tiger
3. Leopard
4. Mountain Lion
5. Mavericks
6. Yosemite
7. Lion

There is nothing official about your opinion and trying to pass your opinion off as official is a joke. Additionally Yosemite has not yet been released and should not be on your joke of a list.
 
Last edited:

Asclepio

macrumors 6502a
Jul 11, 2011
718
315
There is nothing official about your opinion and trying to pass your opinion off as official is a joke. Additionally Yosemite has not yet been released and should not be on your joke of a list.

they are benchmark scores, not my opinion.
 

AxoNeuron

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Apr 22, 2012
1,251
855
The Left Coast
It was the new "Parallels Access" program causing the issue. Uninstalled it and now it's lightning fast. Back to Xcode!

The official list of the fastest OS X released from 2005-present :

1. Snow Leopard
2. Tiger
3. Leopard
4. Mountain Lion
5. Mavericks
6. Yosemite
7. Lion

Yes, in general old software tends to run faster than new software on the same system because it did a lot less and had a lot less features, it's not a huge surprise. Software with a lot less features, less functionality, and less compatibility will be faster. Also, what is "official" about this list of yours...?
 

wyatt23

macrumors 6502a
Mar 7, 2006
539
0
Forest Hills, NY
The official list of the fastest OS X released from 2005-present :

1.Snow Leopard
2.Tiger
3.Leopard
4.Mountain Lion
5.Mavericks
6.Yosemite
7.Lion

I wish I could stay with snow leopard forever. That's the windows xp of the Mac world. Tried, true, fast, all new features to make you switch are meh.
 

brand

Suspended
Oct 3, 2006
4,390
456
127.0.0.1
I wish I could stay with snow leopard forever. That's the windows xp of the Mac world. Tried, true, fast, all new features to make you switch are meh.

Features like newer hardware support are meh? You can stay on Snow Leopard as long as you do it using hardware from the same time. Just like you can still run Windows XP but only old crappy hardware with 4GB of RAM.
 

wyatt23

macrumors 6502a
Mar 7, 2006
539
0
Forest Hills, NY
Features like newer hardware support are meh? You can stay on Snow Leopard as long as you do it using hardware from the same time. Just like you can still run Windows XP but only old crappy hardware with 4GB of RAM.

If newer hardware doesn't feel faster, then what's the point?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.