The article uses a lot of words but doesn't say anything meaningful.
iPhones don’t have the capability to run directly off the changer. All power runs through the battery, whether wired or wireless.Didn't read the ZDNet version but did come across Tech Republic's take: they say that the issue was that when wired the phone skipped the battery and used the power delivered from the charger at all times, whereas when wireless it was running off the battery all the time so would eat into the battery cycles as it continuously topped up the battery.
It sounds plausible - but then again I'm no expert so sounding plausible and it being truthful may be oceans apart.
iPhones don’t have the capability to run directly off the changer. All power runs through the battery, whether wired or wireless.
iPhones don’t have the capability to run directly off the changer. All power runs through the battery, whether wired or wireless.
Exactly. Article is bogus.Yep! While the phone displays 100% it will cycle the top 5% (100% - 95% over and over). This is why you can leave your phone plugged in yet it will consume cycles - plug a Macbook into the wall and it will consume 0 charge cycles because it runs off of the power supply.
My iPhone, however, even if it spends 24/7 plugged in, will consume cycles because it uses the battery 100% of the time.
My Macbook Air 11 (2015) has like 100 cycles because it spends a lot of time plugged in.