Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

What is the maximum extra you would pay for a Zirconia screen iPhone?

  • $100

    Votes: 2 16.7%
  • $300

    Votes: 1 8.3%
  • $700

    Votes: 1 8.3%
  • $1000

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Don't Want It

    Votes: 8 66.7%

  • Total voters
    12
Sapphire is probably more tenable, seeing as companies (including Apple!) have already used it at scale.
But it’s also significantly easier to shatter than even the glass they use now, one of the main reasons they abandoned that idea around the time of the iPhone 6.
Obviously, less of a problem in tiny components, like camera lenses, home buttons, and the Apple Watch display.
But an entire 6.9 inch sheet would be extremely easy to completely destroy with one drop.
Major scratch resistance though, but if you’re asking me if I’d rather have a totally scratched up screen or a totally shattered screen… Well, I think the answer is obvious. I’ll take the one I could actually still use.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Parowdy
But it’s also significantly easier to shatter than even the glass they use now, one of the main reasons they abandoned that idea around the time of the iPhone 6.
Obviously, less of a problem in tiny components, like camera lenses, home buttons, and the Apple Watch display.
But an entire 6.9 inch sheet would be extremely easy to completely destroy with one drop.
Major scratch resistance though, but if you’re asking me if I’d rather have a totally scratched up screen or a totally shattered screen… Well, I think the answer is obvious. I’ll take the one I could actually still use.

Fair shout. What advantages would zirconia have over sapphire though?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.