Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

geekbench

  1. S

    Macbook Pro 13" 2018 Geekbench scores

    Just wondering what kind of Geekbench 4 scores people with the 2018 2.7GHz i17 13" MBP are getting. In the results table on the GB site, it comes in at 5121 for Single Core and 17657 for Multi-Core. I'm getting about 5000-5500 for Single Core on repeated runs, and low-to-mid 16000s for...
  2. Banglazed

    New iPhone Geekbench Score?

    iPhone 8 is faster than the Plus and X. Would it affect your decision to get it if you're considering to get an upgrade? https://browser.geekbench.com/ios-benchmarks
  3. meboy

    So as per Geekbench, 15w i5 is faster than 28w i5?

    The nTB 15w 2.3 with boost to 3.6 (I5-7360U) is faster than the TB 28w i5 with 3.1 with boost to 3.5 (I5-7267U) Really? Sounds good to me as I have zero interest in that touch bar, but a little hard to believe. I tend to trust them for the most part though. They seem to be pretty accurate...
  4. dannys1

    4.2Ghz i7 iMac 64gb & 32gb of Ram - Geekbench Results.

    Got the new top spec iMac in today, also tested it with 64gb of Ram and 32gb of Ram. As usual found that "high performing ram" actually does worse in the iMac than the cheapest stuff you can buy, go figure! (Not that there's much or anything noticable in it, but it's always a few ticks lower...
  5. Kes.Siebring

    iPad Pro New 10.5" Geekbench Results

    Hello If someone is interested here are results from the geekbench 4. P.S. it has 4GB of RAM
  6. L

    GeekBench Drops 31,000 to 18,000...

    So this is my situation, just bought a pre-owned mac pro 2009 from eBay( already sounds like a beginning of a tragedy). 3.46 12 core 128 ram with pcie ssd and titan x. On the item description there's a geek bench screenshot that shows 31000+ on august 2015. And when I received the mac today...
  7. ckjones1

    Less score in geekbench in Lion than Snow Leopard?

    As you can see with lion has more memory. But give a lower score .... Why is this? there's a solution?
  8. OriginalAppleGuy

    Geekbench 4.1.0 New Compute Benchmark

    Geekbench 4.1.0 has been released. With it comes a Compute Benchmark: "Geekbench 4.1.0 brings the new Compute Benchmark to iOS. Written using Metal, the Compute Benchmark measures the performance of the GPU at executing common compute tasks such as image processing and computational...
  9. SoyCapitanSoyCapitan

    Geekbench 4.10 benchmarks

    Hi, I kept noticing CPU and GPU benchmark scores were dropping with each Sierra update. It looks like the new version of Geekbench fixes the inconsistent scores we were seeing with Macbook Pro 2016 models. With the i7-6820HQ 455 Pro model, I now get 4215 single core, 15122 multicore. OpenCL...
  10. B

    Significant lower Late 2016 MacBook Pro Benchmark-Performance since macOS 10.12.3

    Does anyone else see a significant drop in Graphic-Benchmark-Results in the new MacBook Pro 15" (Late 2016) since the macOS 10.12.3 Update? In my case, since I performed the 10.12.3 Combo-Update last week (known for adressing graphic- and/or battery-issues on the new MacBook Pros Late 2016 with...
  11. Eldar Gezalov

    15-inch MBP Geekbench GPU results much worse on 10.12.3

    Hey guys, I just wanted to check if I am the only one who gets much worse Geekbench test results for GPU performance after updating to 10.12.3. Looks like the problem is only with 15-inch MacBook Pro, because I have also tested this on 13-inch tbMBP and the results are the same. I have...
  12. eiprol

    First Geekbench result of new rMBP15"?

    Browsing the Geekbench charts, I've just noticed the existence of a new "MacBook Pro (15-inch Late 2016)". Are these real benchmarks? On multi-core, even the MacBook Pro (15-inch Retina Mid 2014) 2.5Ghz is above the new 2.7Ghz machine. Check it by yourself...
  13. Elence

    iPhone 7 Geekbench results low

    Just curious why my iPhone 7 scores 2556 single score and 3437 multicore. Geekbench 4.0.1 Are you guys getting similar scores? Seems like with this geekbech build its nowhere near the results that were published the first time.
  14. P

    rMB 2016 benchmarks question

    So I finally did what I've been wanting to do for the past year.. I sold my 4 years old but very loved 15" rMBP (mid 2012) and bought the new 12" rMB (early 2016) with M5 processor and 512 GB RAM. And it has been great so far! I really love the new MacBook in every aspect and does not feel that...
  15. leetron007

    Macbook Pro 15" late 2013 too slow performance

    Hi everyone, My macbook pro 15" late 2013 me294, Core i7 haswell 2.3Ghz, Ram 16GB, SSD PCI 256GB, GT 750m & Iris Pro. Geek benchmarks of multicore is too lower than another macbook same type (Me 294). This is my macbook: Multi-core benchmarks score about 6000...
  16. lewis_cooper

    Mac Pro 3,1 - 16GB 667mhz faster than 20GB 800mhz RAM??

    Here's a conundrum for you all… I have a 2008 Mac Pro 3,1 2 x 2.8 GHz running El Capitan 10.11.5. I had 16GB of RAM made up of a mixture of 800mhz and 667mhz modules.The presence of the 667mhz causes even the 800mhz modules to run at 667mhz so I decided to purchase 4 x 4GB modules so that I...
  17. tevion5

    604ev - Tiger and GeekBench

    My ongoing project of building the worlds deadliest Power Macintosh 8600/250 has culminated in a system that now has 1GB of EDO RAM, an 80GB HDD via PCI IDE (along with the 4GB SCSI Fireball), and a Radeon 9200 128MB VRAM. The motherboard and CPU remain unaltered in any form. That CPU is the...