http://www.modmyiphone.com/forums/showthread.php?t=7639
I hope this means that they are working on an AppTapp for 1.1.1 too
I hope this means that they are working on an AppTapp for 1.1.1 too
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
1.1.1 Unlock Solution in the works
- Thread starter Bernie-Mac
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
1.1.1 anyway
I think this battle is over. Updates will come faster than the hackers can hack.
These encryptions may be beyond the realm of the hacker in a limited time frame.
These encryptions may be beyond the realm of the hacker in a limited time frame.
True.. but, being on an unlocked 1.0.2 isn't bad right now.. and when/if 1.1.1 reaches that point, unlocked users can upgrade. When Apple releases the next update (let's call it 2.2.2 for conversation sake), we'll sit happily unlocked on 1.1.1 until 2.2.2 is available for unlocked users. Rinse, repeat.
And, so we dance, at least until AT&T isn't the only game Apple plays in the United States.
This is the exact same tactic Direct Tv took to try to rid itself of the hacking of the DTV cards some years back. Eventually it got to the point where they started releasing updates hourly. A big company like them could afford it. As expected, the hackers gave up for the most part, and moved onto Dish Network.
IMHO, I think this is probably more or less wishful thinking, they might have a better understanding of what Apple has done but my gut tells me they are no closer today than when the 1.1.1 update was released.
I don't see it happening...
I believe Apple is using this update as a buffer, they're working on the next update as of pre-release of 1.1.1, by the time this 1.1.1 update is hacked, if it's ever hacked, Apple will be rolling out the next update..
So
I truely believe they did this to buy themselves time.. so best case scenario is, individuals who want 3rd party apps will always be a version behind, at best..
I believe Apple is using this update as a buffer, they're working on the next update as of pre-release of 1.1.1, by the time this 1.1.1 update is hacked, if it's ever hacked, Apple will be rolling out the next update..
So
I truely believe they did this to buy themselves time.. so best case scenario is, individuals who want 3rd party apps will always be a version behind, at best..
Why on earth would anyone consider unlocking after what Apple JUST DID??
If you do, then my dog could probably beat you in a spelling contest. Hope that sentence isn't too offensive.
If you do, then my dog could probably beat you in a spelling contest. Hope that sentence isn't too offensive.
Ah, but being one version behind isn't so bad, eh? Especially if this forces Apple to keep coming out with new features to entice users into applying their risky updates.
I completely agree..
Unfortunately, it doesn't have to necessarily be updates that include features, they could just be security updates, firmware updates, or updates to update the update..
Also, they could require the iPhone be updated to work with iTunes, in which case you'd also have to be a version (or more) behind with iTunes. Or hackers would have to start hacking iTunes as well.
I've decided to wait. I don't care about 3rd party apps, or unlocking the phone, I want the phone sans the phone to use as an mp3 player with camera. Oh well!
I've decided to wait. I don't care about 3rd party apps, or unlocking the phone, I want the phone sans the phone to use as an mp3 player with camera. Oh well!
There is a big difference between hacking to **STEAL** service, and hacking to make better use of a piece of equipment you own. The correct parallel to this current battle is Sony PSP vs. the Hackers... A battle the hackers are currently winning!
Totally agreed! I think MANY on here are confusing two things... hacking the phone to use with a different cellular service (which Apple should block since their contractually obligated to and it costs them money) and hacking the phone for the PHONE OWNER to add programs for their own PERSONAL USE OR ENJOYMENT.
Idk...the only thing that made me update was the double-clicking home button for music control, there were so many times i was listening to my iphone on speaker while closing at work and it is now so easy to switch songs (not to mention pause the song when my boss walks by) and its a lot easier to change songs while driving...if they can come up with a apptapp for 1.1.1 i dont see any reason to update ever again
Don't forget, there are specific legal exemptions allowing the hacking of a telephone for the purpose of removing single-netowrk use restrictions, i.e. it is legal to do so.
In fact, carriers will issue you an unlock code for your phone, after being under contract for 90 days they have to, but not even AT&T has an unlock code for the iPhone yet. Recent post by Erica Sudan on the topic.
So, really, they are one in the same issue... the hacking of the iPhone for my personal enjoyment varying slight from your definition *but* both entirely within the law.
The difference is that DirecTV re-programs the HU card without user action. If you had a script that blocked the update, the receiver would stop working. With the iPhone, we have the option to upgrade to new firmware or not to upgrade than the phone will still work. For there to be a change like DiecTV and the HU to be effective, AT&T would have to redo their software to check firmware and reject all except current. This would not be in AT&T's best financial interest. Not to mention customer complaints.
I totally agree. I have no problems at all with Apple trying to protect users from moving the phone to other carriers. I do however feel the cellular network in the US needs to be more opened up like Europe. Regardless, I still support Apple in this area.
However, my problem and anger is in them locking out 3rd party developers. I suppose I could see it from Apples point of view for the iPhone, but why the hell did they do it on the iPod touch ? Something doesn't add up there.
Honestly, the pressure is going to come down hard on Apple. Apple has gotten them selves into a very unforgiving cut throat market. By the time the holidays hit, they will not like the numbers they see. The iPhone does what it does very well, but its not enough for most. I know a number of people at work who took the plunge knowing someone would create 3rd party apps for the features they missed. They took the risk and now after Apples response they are regretting it. If Apple is doing this a year from now, do you think people will go after iPhone 2.0 ?
Not a chance.
This is all I want from the iPhone. I'm hoping for an update when leopard comes out.
i'm using 1.1.1 right now, and it's not so bad. but i'm hoping that someone hacks it though, cuz i do miss apptapp
Ill use 1.1.1 when its hacked... Period, end of story. I use my iphone all day now that i have stuff to do on it. Its ashame apple didnt allow this from day one.. the phone is just amazing...
Why not allow it, and just put a disclaimer saying that if a 3rd party program ruins your phone, they dont cover it? That way they allow it, but dont warranty it!! Duhhhh apple...
Why not allow it, and just put a disclaimer saying that if a 3rd party program ruins your phone, they dont cover it? That way they allow it, but dont warranty it!! Duhhhh apple...
Because Apple has to prevent unlock programs, 3rd party apps just got caught in the crossfire. Mark my words, if there are going to be 3rd party apps sanctioned at all, they will be by big developers, tightly controlled through Apple. It is LAME, but that's where Steve is taking the company. Apparently did not learn his lesson from Mac vs. IBM.