Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Originally posted by spaced
I hear 10.2.6 will remove even more debug code and make everyone's system a lot snappier.
Statements like these kill me. I don't claim to know how Apple manages their source code or build process, but as a software developer I can tell you it is *very* typical to be have a "switch" that can flipped during compile time that allows all debug code to be turned on or off. So, regardless of the amount of debug code in a program, it won't effect the speed of a program if it is turned off in any binary distribution of the code.
 
Originally posted by ryan
Statements like these kill me. I don't claim to know how Apple manages their source code or build process, but as a software developer I can tell you it is *very* typical to be have a "switch" that can flipped during compile time that allows all debug code to be turned on or off. So, regardless of the amount of debug code in a program, it won't effect the speed of a program if it is turned off in any binary distribution of the code.

ditto. Maybe he meant optimizations of the NeXT code which I doubt Apple will incorporate into 10.2.6. This is more likely candidate material for 10.3 to help justify another faster better system upgrade.
 
Originally posted by ryan
Statements like these kill me. I don't claim to know how Apple manages their source code or build process, but as a software developer I can tell you it is *very* typical to be have a "switch" that can flipped during compile time that allows all debug code to be turned on or off. So, regardless of the amount of debug code in a program, it won't effect the speed of a program if it is turned off in any binary distribution of the code.

Hehe, I think he was joking!

Debug code post go back to the 4K78 era.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.