Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Well.. not really.
That test is not even close to the real life performance you experience when actually flying X-Plane with lots of scenery.

As Laminar Research have stated: no system can run X-Plane 10 (or 9 for that matter) with all settings maxed out.
So, even the biggest and baddest PC gaming rig with Radeon 6990 can't handle it.

When you are right, you are right.
I put so much custom scenery into Boston that X-Plane 9 almost comes to a stand still when I fly into Boston.

X-Plane 10 has totally new global scenery, a new rendering engine, and it more fully utilizes multi-core cpus, but you know that.
The new Mac Pro should work exceptionally well with X-Plane.

An iMac is a toy. It will not run X-Plane with the extreme renderings that I use.
An iMac may run my professional applications but it would take all night to get my video and 3D renderings done.
But it's all just conversation because in a couple months I'll be the proud owner of a new 2012 Mac Pro with an HD 7870 or better yet an HD 7970.
Life is good!
 
Absolutely right.

That's why I replaced the casters on the compute rack with ATV tires - hook that baby with it's 4Ux1 and 1Ux4 rack computers, 1/10GbE switch and UPS up to the tow ball on the back of my F-150 and we're totally mobile, ready to roll.

I very much want to do this now. Be awesome to roll up with it to SC12 and ask for a SciNet hookup in the parking lot :-D
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.