Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

LinMac

macrumors 65816
Oct 28, 2007
1,270
43
I can understand your frustration, but you might want to think twice about returning the RunCore drive.

There aren't many SSDs available for the Macbook Air and the RunCore competitors aren't any where near as fast as the RunCore drives. You can check the benchmarks yourself to confirm it.

No matter what trouble you have with them. They're worth it in the end.
 

jimboutilier

macrumors 6502a
Nov 10, 2008
647
42
Denver
I can understand your frustration, but you might want to think twice about returning the RunCore drive.

There aren't many SSDs available for the Macbook Air and the RunCore competitors aren't any where near as fast as the RunCore drives. You can check the benchmarks yourself to confirm it.

No matter what trouble you have with them. They're worth it in the end.

While I applaud RunCore for being an innovative new small business that produces products you either can't seem to find anywhere else or perform better than others, I'll point out this is a classic MAC vs PC situation.

At the risk of putting forth two huge stereotypes (but which from my experience are often true), PC folks tend to be tinkerers that are attracted to large feature sets and fast specs, while long time MAC folks are more interested in trouble free productivity and are not too concerned with whats under the hood or how many features something has. I realize this can be very different for recent switchers (in either direction) and not all folks fit into these stereotypes.

Runcore products seem to appear sporadicly in small batches, each batch differing somewhat, with most drives working but each batch having new and interesting problems. Many months after release there are still no decent instructions. Accessories still seem to be of very low quality (which might make some think about the quality of the product itself). Support seems to be from people that care but the systems and procedures in place and the staff quantity make for a pretty poor support experience. So the SOLE things on the positive side are some speed (and in the RevA case) capacity.

Do you really think the Runcore Speed over the stock SSD speed is going to recoup the productivity folks lost with the issues they've had over the life of the drive? And what if the failure rates on these new products are higher? And is Runcore going to be there for you a year or two from now if you have a failure? You have to think about all those things. Maybe these new and unproven products are going to be fantastic and maybe in a year or two RunCore's success will be such they've fixed all their issues and their financial situation will allow them to offer great support. I just don't have to worry about these things with an Apple product.

So for those that have had a trouble free Runcore experience, and enjoy the extra speed over the life of the product, I think thats great. But realize not everyones priorities are the same and a RunCore drive might not be everyone's best choice.
 

samtim

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Jan 13, 2010
14
0
LinMac, jimboutilier pointed out exactly what I'm looking for - fast and reliable solution. RunCore here to offer nice aftermarket upgrade for mac, they should match. In every aspect.
 

x-machine

macrumors newbie
Sep 8, 2009
22
0
Is there a reason not to just get a proper SSD like the Intel X25-M that almost everyone else is using? At least they hardly slow down over time without TRIM command support... I've got one in my iMac and another in my macbook and they're excellent!
 

samtim

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Jan 13, 2010
14
0
That would mean every drive sold is "used" which I wouldn't pay full price for. ;)

haha, i bet all equipment that runs through quality control check - is used one:)

x-machine, im gonna put ssd purchase on hold for now - no matter what brand it is. i will get updated ssd with bigger capacity.
 

Scottsdale

Suspended
Sep 19, 2008
4,473
283
U.S.A.
Is there a reason not to just get a proper SSD like the Intel X25-M that almost everyone else is using? At least they hardly slow down over time without TRIM command support... I've got one in my iMac and another in my macbook and they're excellent!

It will not fit in the MBA, and it doesn't have the same connector. The MBA uses a 1.8" drive that must also max at 5mm height clearance. Also, the MBA uses an LIF connector rather than a standard SATA-II connector. While it would be great to have an Intel SSD in the MBA, Intel isn't currently making an SSD that would fit in the MBA. In addition, the only company making an SSD that will fit and has the right connector is the Runcore SSD.

In all actuality, the Runcore SSD is an excellent drive. The performance improvements are between 3x and 5x over the stock Samsung SSD. So one needs to compare potential products that operate in the MBA, and the Runcore SSD is a no brainer for a complete system performance boost.
 

samtim

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Jan 13, 2010
14
0
update:

Runcore received ssd I’ve sent to them and after check manufacturer admitted - it is really 32 gb instead of 128 gb.
I asked what was the reason - wrong labeling or else - they going to investigate problem and will give reply.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.