Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

NdTonks

macrumors regular
Oct 25, 2021
107
156
Well you know, the problem can be solved if you go business ;)
Or if you absolutely have to work constantly ON a plane, get an Air. Most of us travel with our machine in a carry on bag and work on arrival and have no issues :)
 

kToni73

macrumors regular
Sep 16, 2021
123
76
Germany
Don’t buy the 16” MBP. I just came from the doctor and the discs in my back are pulverized by the weight of the 16” MBP.

Don’t do what I did and buy the 14” MBP instead.

Also don’t drop the 16” MBP on the ground. I dropped it by accident and that is how the Grand Canyon was created.

I’m afraid if I drop the 16” MBP again, the earthquake will be so big that California might disappear in the ocean
Genuinely funny ?
 

jerryk

macrumors 604
Nov 3, 2011
7,421
4,208
SF Bay Area
This is a ridiculous argument. You can damage your body in extreme situations, such as if you carry heavy loads in a poorly designed or adjusted backpack for decades. However, as long as we are talking about 5 kg or 10 kg day packs, sitting in front of your computer is more harmful than carrying the backpack.
Read for yourself. Why Our Bags Are Wrecking Our Backs (nbcnews.com)

And I do agree sitting in front of a computer all day is bad. I try to get up from my desk and go for a walk at least 2 or 3 times an hour even though I use pretty nice Herman Miller chairs and adjustable standing desks.
 

JouniS

macrumors 6502a
Nov 22, 2020
638
399
That article recommends limiting backpack weight to 10-15% of body weight, which coincides with my 5-10 kg rule of thumb for adults. The problems it mentions arise when kids carry 20-30% of body weight in low-quality backpacks that have not been packed and adjusted properly. And when adults use shoulder bags, briefcases etc. instead of backpacks.

Even that 20-30% of body weight is easily manageable if you have a good backpack and know how to use it. Human body is resilient as long as you don't abuse it.
 

Tagbert

macrumors 603
Jun 22, 2011
6,259
7,283
Seattle
There's also the perception of volume. The 16" being bigger may give you the illusion that it's not as heavy than it actually is because the density of both laptops may be similar. The more accurate test may be doing blind test of lifting both.
I would not be surprised if the 16” is slightly less dense. It has a larger cooling system with larger air channels than the 14”. Not sure how much difference that would be but you could measure it.

Still, while the 1.2 pounds difference doesn’t seem like a lot, it does add up if you have to carry it for a longer time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jerryk

Bandaman

Cancelled
Aug 28, 2019
2,005
4,091
Still, while the 1.2 pounds difference doesn’t seem like a lot, it does add up if you have to carry it for a longer time.
Again ... guys ... if 4.8 pounds is too much for you ... even for extended periods of time ... please purchase a gym membership to go along with your new MacBook.
 

JPack

macrumors G5
Mar 27, 2017
13,544
26,169
Again ... guys ... if 4.8 pounds is too much for you ... even for extended periods of time ... please purchase a gym membership to go along with your new MacBook.

You’ve confused ability with comfort. Apple doesn’t make MacBook Air because people can’t carry 3 lbs. Nike doesn’t make shoes using carbon fiber for people who need to visit a gym.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jerryk
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.