The 20" 2600pro model is a value leader plus the fact that is uses like what 80 watts less? That means its a mean green machine. Lets save the planet and trade in those 24" powerhogs.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Big Grin :D :D"
The 20" 2600pro model is a value leader plus the fact that is uses like what 80 watts less? That means its a mean green machine. Lets save the planet and trade in those 24" powerhogs.![]()
all the iMac's are a great machine. I had the 20" but then once i realized how nice the big display on the 24" was I had to get it why not ya know. Besides I had the extra money for it. The 20" is great I just wanted more screen and a little better color. Congrats on Your 20" im glad your enjoying it. dont rush the 24" Your only missing 4" of screen if you dont need it. your not missin onut![]()
Only 4"?!? Gotta say that my wife's 22" HP flat panel looks a little small next to the 24" iMac. And that's only 2"![]()
I'm not sure. Even thought the 20" is "technically inferior" I compaired the two side by side at the mac store and didn't see that much of a difference. Granted i'm not an artitst or anything, so I guess my layman's opinion doesn't count. (My brother is an artist and uses that in similar arguments all the time).
Anywho, my opinion is if you like it, then it doesn't matter; I love my 20" iMac.
For me it was the video card. Thats why I wanted a 3.06mhz 24". Apple's been using the 256 2600 card for a while haven't they? I wonder how much use the 2600 card will be to me a few years from now? Bye the way I haven't purchased yet but probably will in the fall.
I want an iMac for general use, no gaming. I would like a big screen for genealogy charts and for showing photos. What is the better option - a 20" with 4 gig and a bigger hard drive, or a base model 24" for about the same price?
I value any responses.
Is the 2.66 worth the extra $300?
The 2.66 comes standard with more memory a larger hard drive and a better video card. More future proof?How much of a difference would the 2.66ghz make over the 2.4?
I don't do any video editing or play any games. Is the 2.66 worth the extra $300?
That would seem to depend almost entirely on the display being used.lol if 24" imac users are better than 20" imac users than does that mean that mac pro users are better than the 24" imac users???????????????????
Of all the reasons people give for buying a 20" instead of a 24", price is certainly one of the most valid and hard to argue against. I can see that. What I don't understand, however, is the issue of desk space.
Best I can tell, the stand underneath the 24" iMac isn't significantly larger than the stand on a 20", so I find it hard to believe that desk space comes into play - are we then talking about what's above a person's desk being in the way of a 24" iMac? And if you get out a tape measure, is a 24" screen really that much larger?
Oh, and buying a new desk is not always an option.
Yes, the 24" iMac is that much larger. The picture below shows why desk space would be an issue. A 24" iMac would not fit in this space (I measured it) even if you removed the router on the right side.
Oh, and buying a new desk is not always an option.
So you REALLY wanted a 24" iMac, but couldn't afford the desk![]()
LOL!!! Yeah, I guess so.So you REALLY wanted a 24" iMac, but couldn't afford the desk![]()