Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

tsialex

Contributor
Jun 13, 2016
13,455
13,602
See te table on the first post:

 

eicca

Suspended
Original poster
Oct 23, 2014
1,773
3,605
See te table on the first post:


I did see that. My worry is that Apple used proprietary versions or something. I’m guessing that’s not the case.
 

AndreeOnline

macrumors 6502a
Aug 15, 2014
704
495
Zürich
A relatively-cheap 5690 upgrade would put it at over 2k single and 22k multi, never mind the Sapphire Radeon 580 it's got. The thing's a beast.

I see you're quoting Geekbench 4 scores here.

Yes, my X5690 has got Single: 2986 and Multi: 26642.

But scores mentioned previously (at least by me) were Geekbench 5. Here my scores for the Mac Pro are:

Single: 676 and Multi: 6922
 

ScreenSavers

macrumors 68020
Feb 26, 2016
2,125
1,677
Bloomingdale, GA
Will any old x5675 from eBay be compatible? This price seems like the best bang for buck as far as upgrades go. Benchmarks don't put the 5675 far below the 5690.

That’s exactly what I put in mine. Great middle of the road upgrade without buying what everyone else is going for,making to expensive. BTW, I “upgraded” to my 2010 single processor 5,1 from a 2015 5K iMac. I missed the customization and upgradeability.
 

eicca

Suspended
Original poster
Oct 23, 2014
1,773
3,605
Well I bought the $500 one. My iPad will do everything the single core can, and the multi core in this thing obliterates everything else that would have cost three times as much. Logic Pro X, here I come.
[automerge]1586915850[/automerge]
That’s exactly what I put in mine. Great middle of the road upgrade without buying what everyone else is going for,making to expensive. BTW, I “upgraded” to my 2010 single processor 5,1 from a 2015 5K iMac. I missed the customization and upgradeability.

I ALMOST got a 2015 5k. Sounds like I made the right choice!
 
  • Like
Reactions: ScreenSavers

eicca

Suspended
Original poster
Oct 23, 2014
1,773
3,605
Well I don’t know why I was concerned about processor performance or getting a modern iMac. Even with HDDs this thing is much snappier than my MacBook. And just to test it I ran a horribly inefficient Logic project, a 4K YouTube video, a JavaScript benchmark, a podcast and Modern Warfare on max graphics ALL AT THE SAME TIME and it didn’t hiccup at all. And it’s only got 12GB of RAM. My MacBook would’ve caught fire at the thought.
 
  • Like
Reactions: natjonesart

minifridge1138

macrumors 65816
Jun 26, 2010
1,175
197
I don't think anyone said the cMP was a bad machine or a slow one. Just that future upgradability is limited. As long as you know and are comfortable with those limitations, go for it.

The only reason I'm even thinking of buying a replacement is unpatched security vulnerabilities. Although these days it sounds like every Intel chip is a security vulnerability (just kidding. i wish).
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.