This is the reason, but it's just hilarious they purposefully gimped the processor for this.My guess with keeping A10 and Retina is they didn't want to blur the lines with Air and Pro. There has to be some clear technical differences as upgrade steps to justify higher prices.
This is the reason, but it's just hilarious they purposefully gimped the processor for this.
Have you used the current base model iPads? I currently own an xs max and a 6th gen iPad and am more than happy with the performance of the A10 chip inside the ipadThis is just making fun of people who don't understand, nothing more.
I sure hope not, considering that the 3 GB iPhone 7 Plus needs less graphics oomph than a 2 GB iPad 6th generation.I think ipad processors will now differentiate from iPhone chips base on their software. With ipadOS it’s likely that support for iPad devices will have no bearing on when iOS (iPhone) devices stop being supported. It’s entirely possible that the A10 in the iPhone 7 (iOS) could lose support before the A10 found in ipad’s running iPadOS which for all intents will be a software still in its infancy for the next few years.
Much in the same way there are cheap Atom Chromebooks and netbooks, midrange laptops and gaming or workstation level ones, we're getting the same differentiation on iPads. Except the 5th gen and 6th gen iPads are way better than any netbook I've used.I think there is a marketing strategy that's different between base level models and higher lines, that's all. Not saying anything negative about anyone or group.