Last all day (or two?) of heavy work on a full charge? I think not.
I don't use it in the woods. There is always a power socket nearby so that's not even on my list of needs..
Last all day (or two?) of heavy work on a full charge? I think not.
Wintel folks aside, the M2 Max with 96 GB RAM like mine has far outperforms i9 laptops. And Intel boxes will age out as the Mac OS shifts away from optimizing for Intel.
I mean they’re a great space heater for the winter if that’s what you are after.Especially if you need Windows for certain tasks, the value proposition is pretty great:
- Beautiful 16-inch screen with small bezels and no ugly notch
- Amazing speakers
- Good enough keyboard (touch bar is meh, but at least there is Esc key and the ketboard doesn’t break like the Butterfly KB)
- Performance is underwhelming compared to M-series SoC’s, but is still pretty good compared to anything in it’s price in Windows-land
-RAM and storage options are actually decent
- You can still play Windows games on it, while in the M-series, you are stuck with whatever games are available.
The obvious Mac alternative is M1 base MBP or Air, however, there is nothing if you need larger screen, and more storage/memory.
While the support for these machines indeed could be their biggest failing (as Intel is being phased out in MacOS), I’m wondering which will become obsolete first - intel 9th gen processors or 8GB of RAM in a computer - either way, I don’t think longevity is a good argument when choosing a M-series MacBook vs. Intel if the M-series is base configuration.
Let's not play semantics. You knew exactly what I meant. It doesn't boot it at all, natively or not. Emulating isn't booting. It's emulating. Have you tried gaming in Parallels? It's atrocious. CrossOver, using Apple's new game import tool, is the only decent experience in that regard. I use Windows ARM via Parallels and many of the apps I normally use still don't work properly (mostly hard drive/SSD/partition type tools). It's not a great experience.Boot it natively. Apple Silicon runs Windows just fine for most tasks via Parallels, even gaming in more than a few cases.
We don't know if it's been fixed or not.it is still not fixed on the M1 and above Macs, so it doesn't really change anything regarding value.
it is still not fixed
It's not a fault, it's a feature. Modern Macs are not supposed to boot in any other way, that's why T2 (the Secure Enclave) stores everything in the NAND. The problem is when it breaks and the owner doesn't have AC+ or warranty. The repair cost will then easily exceed the computer's value. And, of course, alla data is lost forever, anyways. The Intel 16" often fries (shortens the power supply to ground) the logic board, I'm not sure if this is the case with M-Macs. Hopefully not.We don't know if it's been fixed or not.
Yes it's definitely not as common as say the thing with the oleophobic coating peeling or butterfly keyboards stop working. We had 2 of these 16" ones (work use so they got quite beat) and no issues. I think the touch bar on one broke seemingly by itself from the inside and started flashing random colors. But no SSD issues personally.I won't dispute that because what do I know, but compared to other issues that have popped up through the years for macbooks it doesn't look all too common in the absolute sense.
That's even worse because then the same issue can pop up to the M-series MacBooks, so the value proposition in the same price bracket as the Intel 16" tilts even more in favor of the Intel machine. The M1 Air and Pro came out a year later than the 16", so if the SSD issue is not fixed on them, they have basically the same risk of logic board failure + they have less RAM and storage with lesser features.We don't know if it's been fixed or not.
That's even worse because then the same issue can pop up to the M-series MacBooks, so the value proposition in the same price bracket as the Intel 16" tilts even more in favor of the Intel machine. The M1 Air and Pro came out a year later than the 16", so if the SSD issue is not fixed on them, they have basically the same risk of logic board failure + they have less RAM and storage with lesser features.
Indeed they break in the same way, however if you get a new one now the hardware isn't 4 years old and thus much less likely to break. No Mac should fail after just 4 short years but the risk of failure is simply higher after 3-4 years, new devices don't fail unless they had a manufacturing defect (which would be covered under warranty).the same issue can pop up to the M-series MacBooks