Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

4743913

Cancelled
Aug 19, 2020
1,564
3,716
Wintel folks aside, the M2 Max with 96 GB RAM like mine has far outperforms i9 laptops. And Intel boxes will age out as the Mac OS shifts away from optimizing for Intel.

if I did not want the pc games, I would let it go. but.... since I don't want to play phone games on my computer, it stays.
 

Reached

macrumors member
Sep 18, 2023
34
80
You forgot to mention that you can use it as a room-heater and extra fan as well :D

I have an I9 16", and my M1 Macbook Pro (base) runs circles around it in every single task I throw at them, and it's QUIET and cool while doing it.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Makisupa Policeman

bigjnyc

macrumors G3
Apr 10, 2008
8,297
7,653
whoa I didn't realize this computer had so many issues... My 19' 16 inch has been working wonderfully since I got it shortly after release. Granted I am no power user by any means, but I have rarely ever had the fans kick on. touch bar is meh to me as I don't really use it much, but its there and it works well. I was tempted to pick up a new M3 Pro, but to be honest my current laptop is still working so well and runs Sonoma that I really couldn't justify it. After reading this thread it seems like I am holding a ticking time bomb though LOL.... I will continue to use it though and may revisit my interest for M3 Pro's when they hit the refurb store, since I get an additional 10% off the refurb price.
 

Reached

macrumors member
Sep 18, 2023
34
80
Sorry I didn't mean to come off as rude.

I think if you are a regular user just surfing the web and doing light text editing, you will be absolutely fine with the 19' 16 for sure :)
 
  • Love
Reactions: norwaypianoman

CraigJDuffy

macrumors 6502
Jul 7, 2020
480
780
Especially if you need Windows for certain tasks, the value proposition is pretty great:

- Beautiful 16-inch screen with small bezels and no ugly notch
- Amazing speakers
- Good enough keyboard (touch bar is meh, but at least there is Esc key and the ketboard doesn’t break like the Butterfly KB)
- Performance is underwhelming compared to M-series SoC’s, but is still pretty good compared to anything in it’s price in Windows-land
-RAM and storage options are actually decent
- You can still play Windows games on it, while in the M-series, you are stuck with whatever games are available.

The obvious Mac alternative is M1 base MBP or Air, however, there is nothing if you need larger screen, and more storage/memory.
While the support for these machines indeed could be their biggest failing (as Intel is being phased out in MacOS), I’m wondering which will become obsolete first - intel 9th gen processors or 8GB of RAM in a computer - either way, I don’t think longevity is a good argument when choosing a M-series MacBook vs. Intel if the M-series is base configuration.
I mean they’re a great space heater for the winter if that’s what you are after.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Juraj22

Hopscotcher

Suspended
Oct 28, 2023
55
134
Boot it natively. Apple Silicon runs Windows just fine for most tasks via Parallels, even gaming in more than a few cases.
Let's not play semantics. You knew exactly what I meant. It doesn't boot it at all, natively or not. Emulating isn't booting. It's emulating. Have you tried gaming in Parallels? It's atrocious. CrossOver, using Apple's new game import tool, is the only decent experience in that regard. I use Windows ARM via Parallels and many of the apps I normally use still don't work properly (mostly hard drive/SSD/partition type tools). It's not a great experience.
 

mecloud

macrumors regular
Aug 15, 2019
148
252
As far as the specific “ugly notch” issue… 1) it’s within the menu bar area and therefore not taking away any usable screen space and 2) you can visually make it completely disappear by using a desktop wallpaper that causes the menu bar to be black. That’s how I have it set up, and…look, no “notch”.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0042.jpeg
    IMG_0042.jpeg
    245.7 KB · Views: 74
  • Like
Reactions: Makisupa Policeman

memento mori

macrumors member
Original poster
Sep 17, 2013
32
70
Interesting regarding the SSD issue, however, if I understand correctly, it is still not fixed on the M1 and above Macs, so it doesn't really change anything regarding value. For what it's worth, my 16" i7 machine does not have this issue.

Again, you can easily get these 16" MBPs from a reputable reseller (some even offer a warranty) for as low as $500 in good condition, while you'd be lucky to get an M1 Air in decent condition for that price. And the M1 you would get would be in an anemic configuration of 8GB of shared memory and 256 GB of storage, which, in my opinion, has just as much (if not even lower) longevity than an Intel Mac.
And you get additional features that not even current MBPs get - thinner, sleeker design (although I admit, that is entirely subjective), a notch-free large color-accurate display that doesn't have slow pixel response time, touch bar, native support for Windows and x86 Mac applications. Not to mention that there are no alternatives to the 2019 16" MBP if you need a Mac with a large display.
 

AlixSPQR

macrumors 65816
Nov 16, 2020
1,078
5,466
Sweden
it is still not fixed

We don't know if it's been fixed or not.
It's not a fault, it's a feature. Modern Macs are not supposed to boot in any other way, that's why T2 (the Secure Enclave) stores everything in the NAND. The problem is when it breaks and the owner doesn't have AC+ or warranty. The repair cost will then easily exceed the computer's value. And, of course, alla data is lost forever, anyways. The Intel 16" often fries (shortens the power supply to ground) the logic board, I'm not sure if this is the case with M-Macs. Hopefully not.
 

applepotato666

macrumors 6502a
Jun 25, 2016
516
1,080
I won't dispute that because what do I know, but compared to other issues that have popped up through the years for macbooks it doesn't look all too common in the absolute sense.
Yes it's definitely not as common as say the thing with the oleophobic coating peeling or butterfly keyboards stop working. We had 2 of these 16" ones (work use so they got quite beat) and no issues. I think the touch bar on one broke seemingly by itself from the inside and started flashing random colors. But no SSD issues personally.
 

TechnoMonk

macrumors 68030
Oct 15, 2022
2,606
4,117
My 2019 MBP was the worst Mac I ever owned. It’s was like working in an airport with jets taking off and a space heater on the desk. Poor battery life, noisy fans, throttled too much. Couldn’t wait to get rid of it for M1 Max, probably the only Mac I kept it around for less than 5-8 years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Makisupa Policeman

AlastorKatriona

Suspended
Nov 3, 2023
559
1,029
The 2019 16" MacBook Pro is one of the single WORST value laptops Apple has ever sold, and was immediately rendered near worthless the day the M1 Pros were released. The difference is overall quality between the 2 generations 2 years apart is so vast it can't possibly be overstated. The 2019 16" is a literal space heater that will melt the skin off your legs while getting 45 minutes of battery life...because you have Safari open.

Who cares about Windows. I buy Windows machines for running Windows.
 

memento mori

macrumors member
Original poster
Sep 17, 2013
32
70
We don't know if it's been fixed or not.
That's even worse because then the same issue can pop up to the M-series MacBooks, so the value proposition in the same price bracket as the Intel 16" tilts even more in favor of the Intel machine. The M1 Air and Pro came out a year later than the 16", so if the SSD issue is not fixed on them, they have basically the same risk of logic board failure + they have less RAM and storage with lesser features.
 

gpat

macrumors 68000
Mar 1, 2011
1,932
5,343
Italy
That's even worse because then the same issue can pop up to the M-series MacBooks, so the value proposition in the same price bracket as the Intel 16" tilts even more in favor of the Intel machine. The M1 Air and Pro came out a year later than the 16", so if the SSD issue is not fixed on them, they have basically the same risk of logic board failure + they have less RAM and storage with lesser features.

You're just making up excuses at this point.
Just enjoy your Intel 16" if that's the right solution for you.
 

okkibs

macrumors 65816
Sep 17, 2022
1,070
1,005
the same issue can pop up to the M-series MacBooks
Indeed they break in the same way, however if you get a new one now the hardware isn't 4 years old and thus much less likely to break. No Mac should fail after just 4 short years but the risk of failure is simply higher after 3-4 years, new devices don't fail unless they had a manufacturing defect (which would be covered under warranty).

Apple Silicon runs much cooler as well whereas the Intels especially with the i9 in the 16" heat up easily and all that extra power draw and heat probably isn't the best for the components. Admittedly, I personally don't think heat is a big issue, but cooler running components might improve reliability somewhat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Makisupa Policeman

norwaypianoman

macrumors regular
Dec 16, 2008
246
93
Norway
... and if you buy the 2019 MacBook Pro 16 - which OS is the best to run, as a home computer, and for streaming, and for music production respectively.... to make sure safety and not fry the SSD ? Mine has 4 TB SSD.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.