I've seen a lot of talk about cooling and throttling....does this mean that if apple didn't change the cooling system for the iMac, then an i5 might perform as good as a "throttled" i9?
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
2019 iMac - i5 vs i9? Cooling and Throttling?
- Thread starter Black Diesel
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
It could be identical or worse if the i9 can't go up near its boost speed again after being throttled. The iMac Pro can at least let the CPU raise its clock speed higher before being throttled again.
Depending on what you are doing the throttled i9 can still outperform the i5, i5=6core and i9=16core.
Thats right, my bad sorry! Still if you have a workflow or applications that can handle more then 6 threads, then a throttled i9 still outperforms the i5.
But I believe the 9th generation i5 (9600k, used in the new iMac) also uses different cooling (ie. solder and heat spreader) than the previous generation cpus. You're comparing the 9th generation i9 to 8th generation i7 in the graph.
This subject is "an unknown issue" yet.
We won't know until actual production models get into the hands of users, and actual reports appear.
We won't know until actual production models get into the hands of users, and actual reports appear.
I look forward to to an iFixit teardown to show Apple took design changes into account on the new iMacs to either adopt an iMac Pro like config or slap a larger heat spreader onto the i9 model.
Exactly and until then I wouldn’t even consider placing an order
I want a 27” iMac maxed out especially CPU and GPU but I ain’t in no rush to buy. If the cooling isn’t any better I will just wait. My 2013 rMBP is still going strong but I would like a desktop one day
still the i9 has that thermal paste integrated, the i5 9th gen that is only available into the highest imac default "3.7 ghz 6C" the rest being 8th gen has 91W but separate thermal paste
Still, to have 10-15C colder cpu i9 8 cores than any quad core i7 is impressive and helps with the current imac chassis
I think if Apple put the imac pro cooling, this i9 never passed 75C
Curious - why do you regret the 3.8 for video encoding? Do you wish you would have got the i7? iMacPro?
I wish I got the i7 for the additional performance. I don’t like the iMac Pro due to lack of QuickSync for video encoding.
That's the million dollar question we are waiting for the tech reviewers to answer
That's the million dollar question we are waiting for the tech reviewers to answer
So the reviews will expose any i9 throttling that occurs and compare the performance of the "throttled" i9 to the non-throttled high end i5? Or, do they both get throttled? Sounds like most people are waiting to see this to figure out which configuration is best to order....hopefully soon!
I'm waiting for reviews too. If the i9 offers no real advantage, and maybe one or two disadvantages, I'll go for the 9th gen i5 and spend the money on the Vega 48 instead. I'm in a bit of a quandry because I mainly do photo editing but want to get more into video – do I max out the processor or the graphics card? If I do both the price goes above what I'm comfortable with. Logic says I should spend on the processor and if video becomes more important I can add an external graphics processor later. I can never upgrade the CPU. Need to know the performance difference between the 580 and the Vega 48 before I buy. As well as the difference between the top end i5 and i9.
Is it possible that Apple adopts the 9900KF version of the i9 processor (no integrated graphics but several degrees cooler than the 9900K)?
In a similar way, the traditional i5 9600K could be replaced by a cooler i5 9600KF in the iMac.
In a similar way, the traditional i5 9600K could be replaced by a cooler i5 9600KF in the iMac.
This seems like a rather weird issue to have with the iMac Pro. Unless all you're doing is H.264/5 encodes, you're still going to be saving a ton of time on everything up to the final export.
I've ran some tests on my new iMac with i9. Results:
Cinebench R15: 1662
Cinebench R20: 4067
Geekbench Single: 6394
Geekbench Multi: 33690
Can't get the fans to ramp. Running quiet.
Rendered a 22,000 MP oak tree in Photoshop (yes, 22 giga pixels) and it took it 10 minutes but it never got loud.
In Premiere Pro I'm currently running Warp Stabilizer (default settings) on 5 minute 4K clip I shot on my iPhone XS today with my daughter exploring the woods behind our house. It's saying it's going to take 53 minutes and it hasn't gotten noisy yet. I haven't done much with video in a long time but have been wanting to and I figured this would be an operation that would use a lot of processing. Thoughts on this? I figured it would be at least a little bit loud. I might start stacking lots of background apps now while I'm waiting.
Cinebench R15: 1662
Cinebench R20: 4067
Geekbench Single: 6394
Geekbench Multi: 33690
Can't get the fans to ramp. Running quiet.
Rendered a 22,000 MP oak tree in Photoshop (yes, 22 giga pixels) and it took it 10 minutes but it never got loud.
In Premiere Pro I'm currently running Warp Stabilizer (default settings) on 5 minute 4K clip I shot on my iPhone XS today with my daughter exploring the woods behind our house. It's saying it's going to take 53 minutes and it hasn't gotten noisy yet. I haven't done much with video in a long time but have been wanting to and I figured this would be an operation that would use a lot of processing. Thoughts on this? I figured it would be at least a little bit loud. I might start stacking lots of background apps now while I'm waiting.