get the 27" with core i7. it's only $150 more than the 27" with just the graphics upgraded. you will get it back when you sell it and performance is not an issue.
SOrry it was a type...it's $447 for the i5 not the i7 :-(
get the 27" with core i7. it's only $150 more than the 27" with just the graphics upgraded. you will get it back when you sell it and performance is not an issue.
Thanks for the detailed response. You guys are making me lean more towards the i5 but I do not know when in November they will ship it out. Any ideas?
I currently have a 24" iMac that I have to return within the next 9 days (got it the day before new ones were released lol) so that is why I am stalling and wanting the 3.06 so at least I can return this 24" iMac.
From the links, the i5 defenitely seems like the best bang for the buck. I WILL be running 2 screens so the 512 mb might be a plus. I could cheap out now or spend the extra $447 and get the core i5 which would hopefully have a decent resale value down the road.
As you stated...going core i7 is NOT worth it right?
The i7 is probably a bad idea for you if the i5 is out of your budget. Unless you are a power user who needs hyperthreading save until you can get an i5. And how the hell did you by an iMac the day before it was released without checking this website. We've been expecting a new iMac every Tuesday since the end of September.
I have a dual display setup. What difference will I notice between the 256 and the 512?? I mean will there be an apparent lag or something?
if you dual box like i do, you will want the bigger card. just for smoothness. you will notice when you are doing multiple things on 2 screens.
I wish Apple would have provided an option for the ATI 5700 series. 1GB, 40nm vs. 55nm, 50 watts less power draw and about 40% faster than the 4850.
I just can't bring myself to spend $2,500 for the top 27" iMac and have it come with a one year old mid range card trying to drive a 2500x1400 monitor. Maybe the 5700 will be available in a few months with a matte screen option.
I wish Apple would have provided an option for the ATI 5700 series. 1GB, 40nm vs. 55nm, 50 watts less power draw and about 40% faster than the 4850.
I just can't bring myself to spend $2,500 for the top 27" iMac and have it come with a one year old mid range card trying to drive a 2500x1400 monitor. Maybe the 5700 will be available in a few months with a matte screen option.
Same reason that i will wait. Why cant apple give you 8 gb ram for 2000+ dollars.
Because very few people even need 4GB of ram.
There are many features that just come standard once you start coughing up lots of money for a computer. Apple seems to neglect them for ridiculous periods of time.Because very few people even need 4GB of ram.