Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Dave2D tested M3 Max in Blender 4.0

1699289616279.png


 
So now add Hardware RT to that 🤔
So, without ray-tracing, the M3 GPU core a 58% faster than the M2's. This seems too good to be true.
I wonder if the RT cores aren't used to a certain extent here. If MetalRT is enabled, could it leverage the dedicated hardware, even under blender 3.6? Is MetalRT used in these tests, or is the custom Blender RT code used instead (which is the default)?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: aytan and Xiao_Xi
Yes, MetalRT in older Blender version can already uses HW Rt. See geekerwarn test posted above.
Performance might be a bit different on more recent versions.
 
I am waiting for first Redshift Benchmark and e few real life results, also Octane benchmarks could be give an idea what we could have from M3 Max...
 
  • Like
Reactions: vel0city
Pretty sure Cinebench 2024 is just straight compute.
Can anyone confirm if Redshift uses MetalRT or not?
With the incorporation of Redshift, a different rendering engine, larger memory footprint, and more complex scenes, Cinebench 2024 offers a distinctly enhanced and accurate evaluation of modern hardware capabilities.
 
Can anyone confirm if Redshift uses MetalRT or not?

The only information is this sentence

Redshift GPU performance can be evaluated on systems with compatible Nvidia, AMD and Apple graphics processors.

Base on that it should be, but I am not sure
 
I've been wanting to post this for a few days, but... embargo lol

I have some Octane numbers. I got a friend with a review unit to render a couple of scenes for me:

Octane Standalone 2023.1 / N64 Render:

Nvidia RTX 4090 (desktop)
: 42s
Nvidia RTX 3090 (desktop): 1m00
MacBook Pro M3 Max: 1m45s
MacBook Pro M1 Max: 5m20s

About 3x faster from M1 Max to M3 Max. Not sure if Octane is using HW RT, but I wouldn't count on it so there might even be more improvements coming later.

1DS25vn.png


Octane Standalone 2023.1 / OctaneXBench_VolumeDenoiser:

Nvidia RTX 4090 (desktop)
: 4s
Nvidia RTX 3090 (desktop): 7s
MacBook Pro M3 Max: 15s (this is the same score as an M2 Ultra)
MacBook Pro M1 Max: 30s

h6TE00F.png
 
I've been wanting to post this for a few days, but... embargo lol

I have some Octane numbers. I got a friend with a review unit to render a couple of scenes for me:

Octane Standalone 2023.1 / N64 Render:

Nvidia RTX 4090 (desktop)
: 42s
Nvidia RTX 3090 (desktop): 1m00
MacBook Pro M3 Max: 1m45s
MacBook Pro M1 Max: 5m20s

About 3x faster from M1 Max to M3 Max

1DS25vn.png


Octane Standalone 2023.1 / OctaneXBench_VolumeDenoiser:

Nvidia RTX 4090 (desktop)
: 4s
Nvidia RTX 3090 (desktop): 7s
MacBook Pro M3 Max: 15s
MacBook Pro M1 Max: 30s

8SaUrGL.png
Thank you very much 👍
I supposed this is impressive for a laptop and 3 times faster than M1 :oops:
Well this is something new...
 
About 3x faster from M1 Max to M3 Max. Not sure if Octane is using HW RT, but I wouldn't count on it so there might even be more improvements coming later.
Unless the nvidia GPUs also run without ray tracing, I don’t se how the M3 Max could achieve this score without RT.
These desktop GPUs consume many times the power.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Xiao_Xi
Guess it is M3 Max 40 GPU cores otherwise it is absurd to reach that level with M3 Max 30 GPU cores :oops:
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0242.jpeg
    IMG_0242.jpeg
    545.7 KB · Views: 175
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.