Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Which size looks better on a 171mm wrist?

  • 41mm

    Votes: 15 42.9%
  • 45mm

    Votes: 20 57.1%

  • Total voters
    35
Looks way bigger in photos for some reason.
 

Attachments

  • B8E5BCC7-A29C-4372-BF93-43B9B33AE4F4.jpeg
    B8E5BCC7-A29C-4372-BF93-43B9B33AE4F4.jpeg
    275.8 KB · Views: 2,697
  • CA60F248-0772-414D-9F69-20F56165CA31.jpeg
    CA60F248-0772-414D-9F69-20F56165CA31.jpeg
    244.3 KB · Views: 759
  • EBAB8E9B-352D-46B0-A6B5-0545D1228354.jpeg
    EBAB8E9B-352D-46B0-A6B5-0545D1228354.jpeg
    378.9 KB · Views: 934
  • 4AA08AF6-E7F1-4AA7-B4F0-934D1A1C5A26.jpeg
    4AA08AF6-E7F1-4AA7-B4F0-934D1A1C5A26.jpeg
    288.1 KB · Views: 771
  • Like
Reactions: AppleKarma
Comparison between the two watches 41mm and 45mm I went with the 45mm. The watches look smaller in person compared to the photos.
 

Attachments

  • CD9BB394-A904-4A88-9E64-B27CC8A3A16F.jpeg
    CD9BB394-A904-4A88-9E64-B27CC8A3A16F.jpeg
    387.2 KB · Views: 831
  • 6DC455BB-CC0C-4356-A817-13C9785260B7.jpeg
    6DC455BB-CC0C-4356-A817-13C9785260B7.jpeg
    533.3 KB · Views: 834
  • EF0DE3DB-4D15-4569-A815-1067F3EFA339.jpeg
    EF0DE3DB-4D15-4569-A815-1067F3EFA339.jpeg
    400.3 KB · Views: 838
  • Like
Reactions: AppleKarma
Hi everyone!

I will be purchasing my first apple watch in a couple of weeks and I'm torn on whether I should go with the 41mm or the 45mm series 8.

The current watch I'm using daily is a SEIKO Presage SRPD97J1 (38mm). My wrist size is 171mm. I'd like to have the apple watch as a daily instead. I plan on using it for primarily for fitness, tracking calories, reading messages every now and then, and to view notifications, etc.

Any input would be awesome and helpful! Thanks!
We’ll take this FWIW. If I didn’t know there were 2 different Watch sizes I wouldn’t have thought all the pictures were of 1 watch
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dekicrown
I am a 70 year old woman (grandmother yet) with small wrists and I always wore the smaller Apple Watch. I bought the Ultra, returned it because I felt it was embarrassingly big and also gave me wrist pain. Changed over to the series 8 45mm. Then got Ultra madness again, rebought it and got use to the size, had no more wrist pain and I’m truly loving the watch. I am happy without caring who thinks it’s ridiculously massive on me.
 
Forget both 41, 42, or 45. Go Ultra. With the Trail loops or one of the Hermes leather bands, they are the most comfortable to wear 24/7. But, if you're into looks, Apple watch may not be for you.
 
I am a 70 year old woman (grandmother yet) with small wrists and I always wore the smaller Apple Watch. I bought the Ultra, returned it because I felt it was embarrassingly big and also gave me wrist pain. Changed over to the series 8 45mm. Then got Ultra madness again, rebought it and got use to the size, had no more wrist pain and I’m truly loving the watch. I am happy without caring who thinks it’s ridiculously massive on me.
Cool. It really doesn’t matter what anyone thinks about what Watch you wear, as long as you like it!
 
I am a 70 year old woman (grandmother yet) with small wrists and I always wore the smaller Apple Watch. I bought the Ultra, returned it because I felt it was embarrassingly big and also gave me wrist pain. Changed over to the series 8 45mm. Then got Ultra madness again, rebought it and got use to the size, had no more wrist pain and I’m truly loving the watch. I am happy without caring who thinks it’s ridiculously massive on me.
That's my take also. Who cares what anyone else thinks about how a size looks on your wrist? If you enjoy it that's all that matters.
 
  • Love
Reactions: Kitkat52
This will be my first AW.
My wrist is between 168-171 mm, depending on how snug I pull the tape measure. My plan is to buy both the 41 and 45 in SS and compare, take pics, etc. But the test will be wearing it to bed...not interested in sleeping with a mini-iPhone strapped to my wrist. At 67 years old I am interested in the health benefits such as sleep aid, ECG, etc, and readability of the display is important. However, if I feel 45 looks / feels too large, I'll go with 41.
From what I have read, 170 mm wrist seems to be in the "neutral zone"... could go either way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Broadus
The 41mm looks better from those photos IMO. It looks in proportion whereas the 45mm just looks like a screen slapped on top of your wrist. Up to you though if a larger screen is more important to you than how it looks?

Got to love the people who invade a thread and feel they have to promote a totally different watch like the Ultra! Not everybody likes or wants an Ultra.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: DaPhox
My wrist is about 6.7" (170 mm), not sure if 41 or 45 is the way to go. Friends have given me both choices.
Originally liked SS Silver but now leaning towards SS Graphite with black band.
Comments on size and case finish are appreciated!
 

Attachments

  • Image 11-25-22 at 11.32 AM.jpeg
    Image 11-25-22 at 11.32 AM.jpeg
    231.7 KB · Views: 653
  • Image 11-25-22 at 2.40 PM.jpeg
    Image 11-25-22 at 2.40 PM.jpeg
    367.3 KB · Views: 632
  • Image 11-25-22 at 11.35 AM.jpeg
    Image 11-25-22 at 11.35 AM.jpeg
    638.8 KB · Views: 647
  • Like
Reactions: AppleKarma
My wrist is about 6.7" (170 mm), not sure if 41 or 45 is the way to go. Friends have given me both choices.
Originally liked SS Silver but now leaning towards SS Graphite with black band.
Comments on size and case finish are appreciated!
45 mm, I think.
45 does not look too big, and you get the advantages of a bigger screen (easier to read and display more content for emails, texts, maps, workout metrics, etc).
My wrist is also ~170 mm, and am happy with 45 mm.
But it is ultimately personal preference, especially color and finish.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: addamas and Ken1222
45 mm, I think.
45 does not look too big, and you get the advantages of a bigger screen (easier to read and display more content for emails, texts, maps, workout metrics, etc).
My wrist is also ~170 mm, and am happy with 45 mm.
But it is ultimately personal preference, especially color and finish.
Thanks!
 
The problem I had with the bigger watches like the Ultra was it was always bumping into something, or triggering some corner complication. This became very annoying to me and I found I was staring at my watch more often than needed just to return back to the clock.

I also find that only the Wayfinder Watch face actually looks nice on the ultra. All the existing Watch faces look absolutely massive on the Ultra and bring way too much attention to the giant screen.

Overall, I personally prefer the 40/41mm form factor overall for my 170mm wrist. It wears the best in all situations, including sleep, and it “disappears” on the wrist due to weight and size.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ken1222
I was tore between the three different watches. I tried the Ultra and found it awkward and taking up a lot of the back of wrist of 5.2", so much so I decided that I did not like that size. I have smaller wrist and hands for a man.

I then tried the 45 MM and found that it felt large but not too large, then I tried the 41 MM oh man perfectly reasonable. So I went with a black 41 MM and I am happy. But I did not buy in the store but went to Apple website and ordered it from there to get a 10% discount and it arrived today and I been actively setting it up and finding apps that I want on the watch.

I am 64 years old and retired and as such I still very active so this works perfect for me. I mainly bought it to monitor my heart health as I do have a small amount of plaque in one of the blood vessels on the side of my heart with taking medications for. I never had any issues with this and now I know to have to monitor it.
 
This will be my first AW.
My wrist is between 168-171 mm, depending on how snug I pull the tape measure. My plan is to buy both the 41 and 45 in SS and compare, take pics, etc. But the test will be wearing it to bed...not interested in sleeping with a mini-iPhone strapped to my wrist. At 67 years old I am interested in the health benefits such as sleep aid, ECG, etc, and readability of the display is important. However, if I feel 45 looks / feels too large, I'll go with 41.
From what I have read, 170 mm wrist seems to be in the "neutral zone"... could go either way.
I’m the same age with the same “right in the middle” wrist size. 170mm seems to be pretty common.

Falling and heart concerns are finally making me look seriously at the AW. I wonder how many AWs have been sold to folk with similar concerns.

I would want the watch to slide beneath a dress shirt sleeve, so I’m leaning towards the 41mm. I’ve not tried them on, but I need to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ken1222
I’m the same age with the same “right in the middle” wrist size. 170mm seems to be pretty common.

Falling and heart concerns are finally making me look seriously at the AW. I wonder how many AWs have been sold to folk with similar concerns.

I would want the watch to slide beneath a dress shirt sleeve, so I’m leaning towards the 41mm. I’ve not tried them on, but I need to.
It was for me also having a concern about a minor heart issue that could become serious
 
  • Like
Reactions: Broadus
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.