Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
680MX Benchmarks please
- Thread starter tacokisses
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
I was just browsing your website and noticed you ran Heaven in OSX at 1440 x 900 - could you please tell me why you chose that resolution and how much you're getting at default and native res?
The difference is likely due to the fact that Nvidia's desktop cards have a boost mode, akin to turbo books in intel CPUs, in which they automatically OC themselves when needed. Therefore, during an intense benchmark like 3DMark, a desktop 680 might be clocking itself somewhere in the high 1100s.
I'm glad to hear that a few of you all were able to install Windows on the 3TB Fusion Drive. I read somewhere online that some people were having issues with it. Reading this forum has me so stoked about my 27" iMac. Does everyone have a january timeframe listed for their iMac delivery date?
That's good news. That would make it very easy to clone the Windows partition to an external SSD.
What audio options are available with gaming? Does the new imac only support stereo? For instance would I be able to play need for speed through bootcamp and get surround sound?
This is probably old news but I just thought I'd share. I haven't read through the entire thread. I just thought I'd share this just in case.
Here's a youtube video I found - most of it is in French. But it shows BF3 played on Ultra. Looks like the GTX 680MX can handle it for the most part. It seems to average around 30-35 frames and drops down to the high 20s in crazy firefights. Of course, I haven't entertained the possibility that this is someone saying it's a Mac when it it's not.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hAZlSHVqw8
Here's a youtube video I found - most of it is in French. But it shows BF3 played on Ultra. Looks like the GTX 680MX can handle it for the most part. It seems to average around 30-35 frames and drops down to the high 20s in crazy firefights. Of course, I haven't entertained the possibility that this is someone saying it's a Mac when it it's not.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hAZlSHVqw8
When playing at non standard resolutions like 1440 etc. doesn't the game graphics look horribly stretched? Or if not stretched then doesn't it just appear in a small window in the center of the screen?
How are folks dealing with that problem? For me it has to run everything at native resolution to avoid those issues.
How are folks dealing with that problem? For me it has to run everything at native resolution to avoid those issues.
Everything scales properly. 1080P looks fantastic on the iMac, even though it isn't native. Likewise for 720p (perfect pixel doubling going on here).
This only holds true for games, however, as you'll likely notice some blur running the OS at a non-native res. The best option, if it's available, is to run a games interface at native res and render at 1080p.
Better would be to run games at 1440P without anti aliasing!
This!!! Far cry 3 looks 100x better at 1440p with all settings on medium then at 1080p with all setting on ultra. No need for AA at 1440p either.
Interesting, are there settings higher than that?
From what I hear this is an absurdly demanding game, if this can play at those settings then odds are it can probably play pretty much anything over the next year at high at least. From what I've heard the GTX 680 performs identical to worse in most cases (partially dependent on CPU too).
Thank you very much for testing that one.
----------
From what I read I though you don't need to run only at medium for 1440p for a stable frame rate... I thought Far Cry 3 ran at ultra on native resolution with no AA and FX low?
You can run at ultra on everything with postfx on low but it does not run at 60fps. For solid 60fps you need to have some of the other settings on high and medium (i think you can have them all on high actually) at 1440p. Even gaming rigs with SLI setups are struggling at 1440p with everything maxed with Far Cry 3!!! Also having Postfx on low at 1440p creates some unwanted artifacts especially on the paths as you are walking up them, at 1080p it is fine with it on low... Personally i run a 1440p. no AA, everything on high including postfx and take the hit in FPS, i still average 45fps which is actually really smooth.
Last edited:
Well I'm not exactly after 60, I'm just hoping for the best look with a minimum of 35fps, despite fx, is that possible with ultra? In any case, I'm happy to hear planetside 2 runs pretty well, should mean its safe. That and we still haven't seen the full potential given we still use beta drivers. I'm almost certain ill be getting the iMac, I just like to hear more reassurance as everything I got a new comp I never could play anything new or even old we'll.
Well I'm not exactly after 60, I'm just hoping for the best look with a minimum of 35fps, despite fx, is that possible with ultra? In any case, I'm happy to hear planetside 2 runs pretty well, should mean its safe. That and we still haven't seen the full potential given we still use beta drivers. I'm almost certain ill be getting the iMac, I just like to hear more reassurance as everything I got a new comp I never could play anything new or even old we'll.
At 1440p on ultra you will dip bellow 35fps. It looks awesome on high anyway and you get 45fps+
This is a necessary that should be taken seriously. Even if the 680MX can be over clocked that, however impressive that may be, is a serious risk to the machine. Given how compact the unit is, there is a serious question as to what damage those temperatures might cause to the card itself and to the surrounding components. Not to mention the fans must go nuts, and hope to god they actually work to cool things down significantly enough...
Wow, thanks a lot! Nice to see a direct comparison between the different settings. I played FC3 on my 360 but will replay it on my iMac and it seems like it will run just fine (and a lot better than on any console).
FC3 is one of the most demanding games right now, so the 680mx will be good enough for the highest setting for at least a year.
How good is the interpolation/downscaling quality to 1080p on the screen itself? If its good, it won't be necessary to buy the adapters and cables to use my TV as the main display while gaming.
Upscale is prety good. You can see a little difference. But quality is prety good to play it on good condition.
At 2560x1440 Default settings, Heaven clocks an average 39 FPS on the 680MX (OS X; OpenGL). Under Windows 7 and DirectX, I get 53MB/s with the Boot Camp driver 306.