Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

tttexxan

macrumors 6502a
Jun 25, 2007
698
0
Gosh thats easy-----

D3 and 70-200VR...I have a hook up to get a D3 at 4000 and the 70-200 for 1400...then pick up a 24-70 for 1500...Who needs a flash with an ISO over 6400 that looks like the ISO of 800 on any Canon or other Nikon product on the market to date...I take 12 frames per second thank you very much....But if I had to get a flash then the SB800 would work
 

hubristol

macrumors regular
Nov 28, 2005
102
0
I'd probably get a Canon 1DMarkII or 5D, an 85mm f/1.2, a 50mm f/1.2, a 24-70L, and a lot of studio lighting equipment for starters.

Oh, and probably some medium format gear as well. :D
 

goodmorning

macrumors member
May 15, 2008
36
0
Minneapolis
Canon 40D $999
Battery grip $199.99
580 EX II $439.99
17-40 f/4 L $699.99
24-70 f/2.8 L $1,239.99
70- 200 f/2.8 L IS $1,654.99
100-400 f/4 L IS $1,429.99
100 f/2.8 L macro $504.99
Total $7168.99
Use the rest for a camera bag, filters and flash cards.

Wow, that is almost exactly what I would have done, only I would switch out the 17-40 for a 10-22 :)
 

-hh

macrumors 68030
Jul 17, 2001
2,550
336
NJ Highlands, Earth
$7500 should pretty well cover the next camera system that I want to buy:


A nice full-frame body, such as the Canon 5D "Mk2"
= $3000

An Ikelite Underwater housing
= $1600

Ikelite housing port for above
= $400

Two Ikelite DS-125 strobes, with strobe arms (hopefully)
= $2000

Dang...there's only $500 left with which to buy a nice wide angle lens.
:eek:


-hh
 

Everythingisnt

macrumors 6502a
Jan 16, 2008
743
0
Vancouver
So, a lens and no camera. Use it like a pirate's eye piece, and memorize what you see? Remember the game, all your cool crap got jacked.............

Well I'd have 2,500 left over.. So I'd pick up a nice D300, a 50mm 1.4, and one of those new superwide 11-16mm Tokina DX lenses ($640). Then I'd be set. :)
 

brendanryder

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Dec 28, 2006
654
0
Calgary
$$$$$7682

i went over a little bit. this is worth $7682 from B&H, and i think i might get this setup if summer plans out right.

Canon 40D body =940
Canon 70-200 2.8 IS = 1574
Canon 300 4 IS =1210
Canon 24-70 2.8 = 1190
Tokina 11-16 2.8 =569
Canon 100 2.8 macro 455
Canon 1.4 TC =290
Kenko Extension Tubes =169
Canon 50 1.8 MkII =89

Giottos MT-8340 MT III =292
Giottos MH-3300 Ballhead with MH-658 QR =187
Benro MC-68n6 4-Section 8x Carbon Fiber Monopod =89

Domke F2 bag =122
Impact stands and umbrella combo =98
2x Hoya 77mm Clear coat glass =64ea
Arcatech plate QR plate for 40D = 40
Lexar Card reader =40
Giottos QR plate for 300mm glass =30
Pelican 1120 case =29
2x Impact 290mAh NiMH batteries =25ea
Domke shoulder pad =19
Giottos LEns cleaning kit =19
Pearlstone lens pen =10
small lens pouch=7
Media wallet =7
impact micro fiber cloth =7

for a total of $7682 :eek::p
 

jaduffy108

macrumors 6502a
Oct 12, 2005
526
0
What are you going to be shooting??? Studio? Landscapes? PJ? It's very difficult to make suggestions otherwise.

That said....generally I would suggest a Nikon D300, 14-24, 24-70, 70-200. SB800. Some B+W filters. The Bogen tripod that fits your needs.
 

jaduffy108

macrumors 6502a
Oct 12, 2005
526
0
Gosh thats easy-----

D3 and 70-200VR...I have a hook up to get a D3 at 4000 and the 70-200 for 1400...then pick up a 24-70 for 1500...Who needs a flash with an ISO over 6400 that looks like the ISO of 800 on any Canon or other Nikon product on the market to date...I take 12 frames per second thank you very much....But if I had to get a flash then the SB800 would work

I agree...the D3 is absolutely stunning! BUT...the 70-200VR doesn't work well on full frame. Shocking...I know. 70-200VR works extremely well on the D300.
 

MadGoat

macrumors 65816
Jul 30, 2007
1,179
130
Canada
I would buy two or three Canon L lenses
EF-85mm f/1.2L ($1,689.00)
EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS ($1,664.00)
EF 135mm f/2L ($875.00)
EF-S 10-22mm ($684.00)
EF 300mm f/2.8L IS ($3,899.00)
A Canon flash
A Sigma 150mm macro lens
------------------
I already have a 40D, and a kenko 1.4x extender. I don't see the need for an expensive camera body that becomes obsolete, depending on how you look at it, within a couple of years. The Nikon D3 will certainly be topped by a Canon's version any time now, just like the D3 topped some of the Canon top of the line cameras this year.


That's nice... but how are you going to take pictures? (remember all your gear has been "stolen")
 

tonie

macrumors 6502
Mar 29, 2008
487
0
I would buy used:
MK III
35L
70-200 2.8L
17-40L
24-105L
580X If you still have money left.
 

Maxxamillian

macrumors 6502
Nov 16, 2004
359
0
Utah
I agree...the D3 is absolutely stunning! BUT...the 70-200VR doesn't work well on full frame. Shocking...I know. 70-200VR works extremely well on the D300.

Nikon AND Canon lenses have FX issues. Have the D3 and the 70-200VR and the results have been great. Dpreview gave this lens a "recommended" for FX shooting and a "highly recommended" for DX.

http://www.dpreview.com/lensreviews/nikon_70-200_2p8_vr_n15/page7.asp

I love both the camera and the lens. More importantly, so do my clients.
Does it count if I've already spent the $7,500?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.