Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

cptcaveman

macrumors regular
Jun 6, 2005
197
257
Isn't current 4K on the 13 Pro already being compared to DSLR? Or am I mistaken?
In my experience people comparing "DSLRs" or more correctly mirrorless cameras to phone cameras don't know what they are talking about.

A full-frame camera with a camera-sized lens and sensor with real glass elements and coatings will always give you a better picture. Always. Even with a ****** kit lens.

It's called physics.
 

jav6454

macrumors Core
Nov 14, 2007
22,303
6,262
1 Geostationary Tower Plaza
In my experience people comparing "DSLRs" or more correctly mirrorless cameras to phone cameras don't know what they are talking about.

A full-frame camera with a camera-sized lens and sensor with real glass elements and coatings will always give you a better picture. Always. Even with a ****** kit lens.

It's called physics.
Yes, I agree, yet people still do it. More so now that Apple touts the Pro lines of phones as “Cinematic” enabled.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.