Or, we might know better than to buy all all-in-one since the LCD will last three generations of computer. So when your iMac dies or is obsolete, and your display becomes useless, I'm sitting here with the same three LCDs, and I swap out the Mini.
But you're right, we're just too cheap for an iMac which is *way* better and can totally be moved over to the home theater, or the kitchen, or my car.
My server is a home built Linux box. I don't have to look at it, but it needs to host up my Time Machines, files, iTunes, etc.
The ACD is useless to me because it only has one input and a fixed cable length. With a normal panel, I can plug in what I want, and as far from the device as need be. Can't do it with an ACD.
I don't need a Mac Pro, an iMac is worthless to me. I don't like notebooks for the same reasons as the iMac. The Mini is perfect for me.
I'm not jumping on the new Mini just because the chip isn't an upgrade from the 2009 Mini. In 2011, I'll buy in. And plug it in to the same LCDs that I'm using now.
Look, you like what you like, and you certianly don't have to justify it to me or anyone. Awesome for you, and I agree with your logic of skipping this generation.
I do have to doubt your assertion that an imac LCD only lasts for three years. I think it's patently false, actually. There are plenty of old imacs still up and rocking. My gods, on "The City" Whitney is still using acrylic imacs, and they work fine.