Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

kindaichi81

macrumors regular
Nov 3, 2015
242
127
iPad of the current year will always use the old processor from iphone. It is always the case. Next year iPad refresh will only get the upgrade.
 

Cakefish

macrumors 6502a
Oct 14, 2015
512
308
That's true.



Have a look at previous releases:

iPhone 4 - A5 - Sept. 2011
iPad 2 - A5 - Mar. 2011

iPad 3 - A5X - Mar. 2012

iPhone 5 - A6 - Sept. 2012
iPad 4 - A6X - Oct. 2012

iPhone 5S - A7 - Sept. 2013
iPad Air - A7 - Oct. 2013

iPhone 6 - A8 - Sept. 2014
iPad Air 2 - A8X - Oct. 2014

iPhone 6S - A9 - Sept. 2015
iPad Pro - A9X - Nov. 2015

iPhone 7 - A10 - Sept. 2016
iPad "2017" - A9 - Mar. 2017
iPad Pro 2 - A10X - June 2017

iPhone 8 - A11 - Sept. 2017

Apple have had a pretty consistent schedule of releasing iPhone's with their new chip followed by iPad's with "X" variant chips a month later. This is true for all except the introduction of the iPad 2, iPad 3 and iPad Air.

It's quite possible that we'll see Apple:
a) Quietly update the iPad Pro with an A11X after the iPhone X release or
b) Prolong iPad Pro 2 life cycle until October 2018, potentially skipping A11X and going to A12X (or even A12 like they did with the iPad Air's A9) or
c) Stick to a yearly update and release new iPad Pro's with A11X in June.

I suppose it all really depends on how well they sell and how Apple want to position their Pro line.
The A10X is actually the smallest die size in an iPad SOC for many years, thanks to the 10nm node. That means it's the cheapest to produce. I don't see Apple willingly cutting into their profit margin by building a larger A11X chip until it's absolutely necessary to maintain sales volume of iPads.

When looking at the longevity of recent models I think the lifespan of iPad models is getting slightly longer than 12 months:

iPad Air 2 (Oct 14 - Mar 17)
iPad Pro 12.9" (Oct 15 - Jun 17)
iPad Pro 9.7" (Mar 16 - Jun 17)
 

gobikerider

Suspended
Apr 15, 2016
2,022
1,478
United States
That actually hurt apple more then it helped, because of the bad PR and angering customers. The idea was that people thought that the Apple messed up on the 3rd gen iPad and had to go back to the drawing board.

I doubt that apple will go down that path again, they're finally increasing iPad sales, why do something that could potentially piss off their user base.
Yah and the iPad Pro aren't underpowered like the iPad 3 had been.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.