Josias said:I saw this in a local magazine few days ago. This thing weighs more than the 17" iMac. BTW, why would they bother putting in two 2.5" HDD's instead of 1 3.5" HDD. Largest 2.5" available is 200 GB. Largest 3.5" is 750...
RAID.
Josias said:I saw this in a local magazine few days ago. This thing weighs more than the 17" iMac. BTW, why would they bother putting in two 2.5" HDD's instead of 1 3.5" HDD. Largest 2.5" available is 200 GB. Largest 3.5" is 750...
Eidorian said:Redundant Array of Independent/Inexpensive Disks
bbrosemer said:Its actually for self conscious people who think they need to lose weight, so rather then carrying around a 6lb Mac, they are going to carry around the extra 17lbs in hopes that it will help them lose weight.
zap2 said:i think its for people who sit at desk.. but want to be able to move workspace fast... which is a small market. But 240Gb gosh!
Josias said:OK, but what does it do? I don't know what redundant means? I guess RAID is where multiple disks works as one right?
MattyP said:Redundant means that there are more than one thing fulfilling the same function. A Raid setup constantly backs up data and then backs it up again on a group of harddrives, incase one fails there is always an extra copy.