Mine failed on the old software As well.i was having the test fail issue since about 48 hours after getting the pods. I noticed the left one didn’t seem to work as well as the right one. Went to the Apple store and they replaced the left pod only. Took the large tip from my original pod and put it on the new one. (Replacements only come with medium). The new left pod then passed the fit test with the original tip for 24 hours. The Apple store rep mentioned the new pod would was still running the old firmware. I wonder if that is what causes the fault. Perhaps once the left pod updated its software is when it began to fail.
The tips deteriorating seems very unlikely to me. I’m hoping it’s a firmware issue (and sorry the latest firmware update didn’t fix it). I’m worried, on the other hand, that the interior microphones fail after a short period of time causing the test to fail. I wish Apple would address. To me the fit feels unchanged, and the sound and ANC feel about the same.
I’m still interested in whether others find that the fit test passes when the earphones are new, but then starts failing consistently after a few days.
That has been my experience as well.Yes. That's a common theme throughout this thread and my experience as well.
Yep. On my third set. The third set gets the green seal every time since I got them a week ago. Fingers crossed.
After exchanging the APpro the second time because: first passing seal-test then after more than 1 week failing first 1 than both AP I found out:
The bone-conduction is less on the new ones. When I walked to the Apple-Store with the "old" ones I could hear the footfall(sound) like with common inEars. On the way back from the Store with the "new" ones the footfalls where not noticable!
It seams that the internal technic/micros that are responsible to avoid bone-conduction
->An inward-facing microphone listens inside your ear for unwanted sound, which is also eliminated with anti-noise.
-> and also the inner adaptation to the geometry of your ear and the fit of the ear tips
tend to fall after some time.
The seal-test is only the indicator of the truely defect.
After exchanging the APpro the second time because: first passing seal-test then after more than 1 week failing first 1 than both AP I found out:
The bone-conduction is less on the new ones. When I walked to the Apple-Store with the "old" ones I could hear the footfall(sound) like with common inEars. On the way back from the Store with the "new" ones the footfalls where not noticable!
It seams that the internal technic/micros that are responsible to avoid bone-conduction
->An inward-facing microphone listens inside your ear for unwanted sound, which is also eliminated with anti-noise.
-> and also the inner adaptation to the geometry of your ear and the fit of the ear tips
tend to fall out after a time.
The seal-test is only the indicator of the truely defect.
…second exchange unit: still 1.0.0 – I claim for myself as discoverer of the failing intern micro issue like: inward-facing microphone-gate (better than seal-test-gate because its a hardware issue with a real defect concerning sound-adaptation and bone-conduction).If there is already a version > 1.0.0 then Apple might have already addressed the problem.
But if the mics are failing then wouldn’t this have registered under UAT. They must have had hundreds of Apple employees testing the product for months before releaseIf the mics are failing, it is a disaster for Apple, because it will affect every single AirPod. It would not only explain why the test fails, but also the sudden lack of bass and overall audio quality, as the anti-noise is generated and piped into the speaker based upon the signal the mics pick up.
yep - there may be one causality – vice versa the (here often reported after some time) failing seal-test may be an indicator of a defect (not only wrong test-algorhythm or software issue or silicon-material-issue…).I dont know the issue with this. Do y'all mean that your seal test fails after weeks because of failing mics ?
yep - there may be one causality – vice versa the (here often reported after some time) failing seal-test may be an indicator of a defect (not only wrong test-algorhythm or software issue or silicon-material-issue…).
I agree. Once you determine which size fits no need for further testing. The tips aren’t deteriorating.So how come everyone isn't experiencing 'tip deterioration'? Mine fit the same as Day 1.
What is the need for the ear tip fit test after you initially get them? It's almost as if you're intentionally trying to get this little software gimmick to fail by doing it over and over again.
No one needed their phone to tell them if their earbuds fit a few weeks ago (noise cancelling or not). I find this bizarre.
My replacement pros arrive in Thursday so will check the firmware and hardware release numbers. I never had any sealing issues with the large tips but I withheld them when I sent my last Pros back and I have a spare set from a retail store so when my replacements arrive, I shall run the seal test with all three sets of large tips. I am expecting them to all pass initially.
If they all pass then I know the tips and hardware are good and I will use just one set over the next few weeks and if that set starts to fail, I will try a different pair and if they fail then I know it’s definitely hardware and if they seal then it’s tip deterioration
So are you saying that this is definitely hardware failure and for those who run the seal test regularly or detect deterioration of quality of sound , Apple can expect hundreds of thousands or possibly millions of returns for poor hardware design/failure?For those who ask why one would run the test more than once after initial setup: The test’s purpose is to test for a good seal. A minimum amount of seal is required to reach the audio quality that the product is designed to produce. That is important for reproducing lower frequencies as well as preventing noise leaking into the ear and bypassing the mics.
I did some testing with replacement AirPods and “old” AirPods. In order to prevent a placebo effect, which is very common in the world of Hi-Fi, I tested the pairs blindly and had another person write down the results. I also tested different tip configurations (old AirPod + new tip; new AirPod + old tip etc).
I repeated the tests 5 times for each configuration.
The results are clear:
The new AirPod always had a seal, with a brand new tip or with an old one that failed the test before on an old AirPod.
The old AirPod failed the test with a new AND old tip.
5/5 times I would rate the audio quality better (better bass and ANC performance) in case of a new AirPod with new tips. The test showed a good seal.
5/5 times I would rate the audio quality better (better bass and ANC performance) in case of a new AirPod with old tips. The test showed a good seal in all cases as well.
I would rate the bass and ANC performance worse when testing the old AirPods, both with new and old tips. The fit test would fail in all cases.
So, it’s not the tips. It’s not the ear that suddenly changes. Something causes the fit test to fail after about a day or so of usage and the audio quality, mainly bass reproduction and anti-noise generation to drop.
The only explanations that come to mind are: blockage of the vents or degrading microphones. The physical seal of the ear canal doesn’t change.
But if the mics are failing then wouldn’t this have registered under UAT. They must have had hundreds of Apple employees testing the product for months before release
For those who ask why one would run the test more than once after initial setup: The test’s purpose is to test for a good seal. A minimum amount of seal is required to reach the audio quality that the product is designed to produce. That is important for reproducing lower frequencies as well as preventing noise leaking into the ear and bypassing the mics.
I did some testing with replacement AirPods and “old” AirPods. In order to prevent a placebo effect, which is very common in the world of Hi-Fi, I tested the pairs blindly and had another person write down the results. I also tested different tip configurations (old AirPod + new tip; new AirPod + old tip etc).
I repeated the tests 5 times for each configuration.
The results are clear:
The new AirPod always had a seal, with a brand new tip or with an old one that failed the test before on an old AirPod.
The old AirPod failed the test with a new AND old tip.
5/5 times I would rate the audio quality better (better bass and ANC performance) in case of a new AirPod with new tips. The test showed a good seal.
5/5 times I would rate the audio quality better (better bass and ANC performance) in case of a new AirPod with old tips. The test showed a good seal in all cases as well.
I would rate the bass and ANC performance worse when testing the old AirPods, both with new and old tips. The fit test would fail in all cases.
So, it’s not the tips. It’s not the ear that suddenly changes. Something causes the fit test to fail after about a day or so of usage and the audio quality, mainly bass reproduction and anti-noise generation to drop.
The only explanations that come to mind are: blockage of the vents or degrading microphones. The physical seal of the ear canal doesn’t change.