Anybody else experience this? I know they have a battery / bluetooth in them so they are probably hotter than just normal headphones, however, I just want to make sure that it's normal activity before I have a Galaxy incident in my ear.
Not HOT HOT, just warm.
Same to report here.For what it's worth I've been using mine nigh on as constantly as their battery allows for the past three days. More than I usually would because I'm breaking them in and I'm monitoring their battery life.
Anyway, at no point even with hours of constant use, have either of the AirPods gotten warm at all.
Yes, same issue. I was very excited to begin using the air pods which by the way work really well. All of a sudden after a conf call I got a sharp pain behind my ear on the side of my head. Stopped using the Air pods and I'm fine. Decided to give it another go today and after a 5 min call started to feel the pain again. I'm done, not worth the risk. I contacted my rep at Apple to let him know what I experienced. If they take then air pods back, great if not I'm trashing them.i just got mine this afternoon, and I'm curious if anyone else is getting a slight headache/ear pain? I probably used them for an hour at a very low volume, and I noticed right away I was starting to get a slight headache. I took them off for a few hours to see if my headache would go away, and it eventually did. I tried using them again, and I could feel after a few minutes my ears getting sore.
I'm hoping this is just an issue with the Airpods being just a little bigger or heavier than what I'm used to, and not me having an issue with Bluetooth devices in general.
Has anyone else experienced anything similar?
Psychosomatic and/or other issues (physical discomfort/poor fit, too loud volume, too much treble, and so on.) Bluetooth wireless tech doesn't, and in fact can't affect human beings.I don't even think about buying the Airpods. Any Bluetooth enabled device in my personal space, gives me headache, and worsen my tinnitus.
So don't worry about bluetooth. Anyone saying it causes...whatever, they're either trying to con you for some reason (selling you a belief system, a book or a snakeoily gimmick of some sort), or they're unscientific and/or clueless and/or paranoid kooks. Or all of the above.
Appeal to authority fallacy.
2.4GHz RF transmissions CAN'T affect human tissues. Impossible. It does NOT cause cancer. End of story.
And as mentioned, 2.4GHz EM waves don't interact particularly strongly with human tissues - they can't disrupt normal cell functions and as such don't cause cancer. We know this; physics tells us so, and alarmist internet weblinks be damned.
Psychosomatic and/or other issues (physical discomfort/poor fit, too loud volume, too much treble, and so on.) Bluetooth wireless tech doesn't, and in fact can't affect human beings.
Psychosomatic and/or other issues (physical discomfort/poor fit, too loud volume, too much treble, and so on.) Bluetooth wireless tech doesn't, and in fact can't affect human beings.
Because it's unscientific claptrap. Difficulties arise for a reason, they don't arise 'because some people are different'; people aren't THAT different that the laws of nature affect them in different ways than anyone else.Why is so difficult for you to accept that few of us are having difficulties with Bluetooth?
Wifi does NOT affect people; not "a lot" of people, or even a few. None. Zero.However wifi can and does affect a lot of people. Perhaps the person is actually reacting to wifi but thinks it's bluetooth?
Often these issues stem from a fundamental lack of understanding of how things work; if we're unfamiliar and lacking in experience with something - such as wireless tech - it tends to scare many of us. (Immigration is a classic non-technical incarnation of this phenomenon.)
Yes, confirmation bias is a thing.I noticed some people reported the same thing elsewhere (and not for Apple products):
You're desiring a negative to be proven to you. Like, prove that Santa Claus does not exist; it can't be done.It seems to me that the lack of scientific evidence does not confirms these devices are safe.
What is your qualifications for determining it has not been studied enough?What needs to be said here (and always reminded before further conjectures) is that this is a relatively new technology that hasn't been studied enough.
Not sure what that has to do with anything, CRTs is an entirely unrelated thing to bluetooth wireless tech. Also, many CRTs defaulted to 72/75Hz to avoid flickering.Have people completely forgot CRT's refresh rate of 60 Hz?