"the issue is whether or not the government regulations are safe enough."
Exactly. I mean, Apple spends a gizillion on testing.
http://gizmodo.com/5589054/apples-100-million-iphone-test-chamber
So, why on earth don't they conspicuously publish the "health" part of it in terms people understand? even if only to give those conspiracy theorists a reason not to freak out when some sort of placebo or psych effect takes place. Why wont they be more transparent about it? they are very thorough when it comes to the eco-friendly bs, why skimp on radiation?
Political affiliations aside pls, look at the EPA! when the gov says "yah, that spec is within limits so u should be fine" do you take that at face value?
Exactly. I mean, Apple spends a gizillion on testing.
http://gizmodo.com/5589054/apples-100-million-iphone-test-chamber
So, why on earth don't they conspicuously publish the "health" part of it in terms people understand? even if only to give those conspiracy theorists a reason not to freak out when some sort of placebo or psych effect takes place. Why wont they be more transparent about it? they are very thorough when it comes to the eco-friendly bs, why skimp on radiation?
Political affiliations aside pls, look at the EPA! when the gov says "yah, that spec is within limits so u should be fine" do you take that at face value?