Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Very nice setup, never tried the Focal's but have used Sennheiser HD 800 S and they are quite remarkable. Personally the AirPods Max's offer a really compelling package that works brilliantly with the Apple ecosystem, my only gripe is not being able to turn them off with that stupid and useless case. If they just had an auto-off mode after say 10 minutes of inactivity and you just push any button to turn them on again I would purchase them right now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coltaine
Very nice setup, never tried the Focal's but have used Sennheiser HD 800 S and they are quite remarkable. Personally the AirPods Max's offer a really compelling package that works brilliantly with the Apple ecosystem, my only gripe is not being able to turn them off with that stupid and useless case. If they just had an auto-off mode after say 10 minutes of inactivity and you just push any button to turn them on again I would purchase them right now.
Without case they enter the same low power mode after five minutes that they enter right away, when you put them inside the case. Ultra low power mode is reached after 18 hours inside the case and after 72 hours without case. So the difference should only be significant, if you leave them idle for more than 18 hours.


On another note: I find the case far less cheap and annoying as reviews had me believe.
 
On another note: I find the case far less cheap and annoying as reviews had me believe.

good point!
I have not used the case since I had mine. The case is made with good material, if you need to use it. Yes, it will not protect all surfaces. But, we should use this AirPods Max all the time. Enjoy the great sound. Every tech product will wear down and in 2-3 years, replaced with something more exciting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coltaine
Without case they enter the same low power mode after five minutes that they enter right away, when you put them inside the case. Ultra low power mode is reached after 18 hours inside the case and after 72 hours without case. So the difference should only be significant, if you leave them idle for more than 18 hours.


On another note: I find the case far less cheap and annoying as reviews had me believe.

My issue is I'll never us it. I want to be able to just take them off and have them go into the ultra low power mode automatically after say 15 minutes and I'm happy to press a button to make them come back on. To me that's a much simpler solution that I couldn't imagine anyone would be unhappy with.

Thanks for the link, I'll definitely read up on it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coltaine
My issue is I'll never us it. I want to be able to just take them off and have them go into the ultra low power mode automatically after say 15 minutes and I'm happy to press a button to make them come back on. To me that's a much simpler solution that I couldn't imagine anyone would be unhappy with.

Thanks for the link, I'll definitely read up on it.
First Apple should have used the standard nomenclature:

Low Power=Standby
Ultra Low Power=Off

Find My only works in Standby so if they Power off quickly then there is no Find My offered. Actually for most people the minuscule amount of power drain on Standby is worth it to have the security of Find My feature active that Apple provides.

Apple's logic is probably:

If you put them in the case (another poor nomenclature and should be called a cover at best) you have likely secured them.

If you haven't then you may have taken off and laid them down and may have forgotten them.

Apple could easily add a Power Off to the firmware by a long hold press on the button. Maybe they will do this with the added caveat that you immediately lose Find My. Although this does give a potential theft an EASY way to disable Find My.
 
Last edited:
These are my first pair of over the ear headphones. I was having a great time since Christmas with them but now I am looking closely at the fit and my ear lobes are actually peeking out beneath the cups. In the mirror if I open up the headphones, I can see that the canal part of my ear is actually at the bottom 1/3 of the driver area. When I take the cups off the headphones, they do surround my ear if only the headband were longer.

Yes, I have them fully extended. I have tried different head placements.

I guess my head is a big oval. I wear XL sized motorcycle helmets.

another issue, is if I wear a hat, then my ear lobes will likely be showing. This would affect the ANC no?

Question for you audiophile, what is the proper fit of over the ear headphones. Should the driver be entered with my ears? Apple needs to make an extension option available if this is the case. IT seems like a cheap enough part option!
 
These are my first pair of over the ear headphones. I was having a great time since Christmas with them but now I am looking closely at the fit and my ear lobes are actually peeking out beneath the cups. In the mirror if I open up the headphones, I can see that the canal part of my ear is actually at the bottom 1/3 of the driver area. When I take the cups off the headphones, they do surround my ear if only the headband were longer.

Yes, I have them fully extended. I have tried different head placements.

I guess my head is a big oval. I wear XL sized motorcycle helmets.

another issue, is if I wear a hat, then my ear lobes will likely be showing. This would affect the ANC no?

Question for you audiophile, what is the proper fit of over the ear headphones. Should the driver be entered with my ears? Apple needs to make an extension option available if this is the case. IT seems like a cheap enough part option!
The cup should cover your ear. If pieces of your ear stick out, you will have compromised your acoustic seal, and yes, the driver will be in a suboptimal place in relation to your ear.

Sometimes this can be alleviated by placing the headband so that it doesn't go over the very highest point on your head. This tends to lead to a less secure fit (particularly with a bit heavier phones such as the APM), but it could make for a preferable compromise overall depending on the particulars of the situation.

Not all phones fit all heads. For some people that fall a bit to the side of the distribution peak, this actually makes a good case for in-ear phones, just as having a bit unusual outer ear folding makes most in ear monitors sound off as they have to simulate the colouring of your individual ear. Good Luck!
 
Sometimes this can be alleviated by placing the headband so that it doesn't go over the very highest point on your head. This tends to lead to a less secure fit (particularly with a bit heavier phones such as the APM), but it could make for a preferable compromise overall depending on the particulars of the situation.


thanks for the confirmation. I spoke w Apple service and they just recommend I send feedback and could choose the option to return. Grrrr, Apple could easily Make an extended stem piece about 1/2” longer and retrofit as necessary if the headphones are easily to take apart. Alot of larger head people would have this same issue .....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Deep Dish
Find My only works in Standby so if they Power off quickly then there is no Find My offered. Actually for most people the minuscule amount of power drain on Standby is worth it to have the security of Find My feature active that Apple provides.
I thought Find My for Airpods only worked when they were connected to the phone. Little Airpods, sure, easy to drop behind the sofa or wherever, but Airpods Max? Harder to lose when they're still within bluetooth range I'd've thought.

if you leave them, say, in a cafe and someone moves them from the exact spot you left them then Find My won't help. Plus there's no activation lock so the finder could simply pair them with their phone and they're gone.
 
Many of my audiophile “friends” have stopped sending me Christmas cards and remove me from LinkedIn. Maybe time to move out of Hollywood. Lol.

Most of them have not even tried listening to the AirPods Max. Nevertheless they are opining and defending “something” whatever that is.
There are people rejecting an objective world view that, if accepted, would ruin their placebo of choice. It’s rational, in a sense, but not really.

Anyway, it’s interesting to see local digital audio processing in phones to this extent and quality. I so wish they allowed finegrained (1/3 octave) and/or parametric EQ to be downloaded to their phones and applied to the target response! One can hope. The existance of the accessability settings imply that it should be possible. (As it would mean that the individually adjusted response would be there for any source played on any device, wired or wirelessly.)

I haven’t tried measuring the APMs myself, so I’m quite curious regarding how they do on frequency response, group delays, channel balance and uniformity, THD and IM, et cetera. I guess rtings will come to the rescue. I miss Tyll Hertsens a bit. I have a feeling they will do quite well on the bench, it should be easier digitally correct something that is good quality to start with, without running into second order issues.
 
I haven’t tried measuring the APMs myself, so I’m quite curious regarding how they do on frequency response, group delays, channel balance and uniformity, THD and IM, et cetera. I guess rtings will come to the rescue.

FR, THD, and comparisons on a B&K 5128 :
FR, THD, ANC on a GRAS :
FR on a GRAS :
 
  • Like
Reactions: EntropyQ3
FR, THD, and comparisons on a B&K 5128 :
FR, THD, ANC on a GRAS :
FR on a GRAS :
Thanks! Having read all the graphs and done some back and forth they match my experience, but I’m still surprised at the extremely low levels of THD at high SPLs in the bass region. Remarkable, and implies nice things about the base transducer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coltaine
I miss Tyll Hertsens a bit. I have a feeling they will do quite well on the bench, it should be easier digitally correct something that is good quality to start with, without running into second order issues.

Some 20 years ago, before Tyll was un-reachable (still is), he sold me the last remaining Sennheiser Orphesus at Headroom for 7500. A trophy find. Yes, many have sounded better than this one since, but as an art piece. It's treasured.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coltaine
Added a Blue version!

IMG_7655.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: bas.o and Phil1975
These are happy times for audiophiles as even at $549, one can achieve at the minimum 95% of the best out there. IMO.

It’s hard to believe that Bluetooth headphones using AAC codec can sound almost as good as as those expensive audio equipments.

I would agree. None of my wireless headphones has the equivalent performance of my wired ones. I am skeptical that the Airpods Max can overcome the limitations of bluetooth. But all that computational power is doing something, so I'll wait until they go on sale and then evaluate myself.

fretting over AAC compression (unless we're going beneath 256) is silly, it's almost no objective difference. Only the most trained of ears will notice a difference.

There are obviously physical differences which would preclude some people hearing the difference. It is true, in a sense, that untrained ears may not notice the difference. One may be happy with the crappy sound of airpods if that is all you have ever heard. But if you really care about your music, get a kick out of hearing an instrument or sound which is missing in airpods, then you will never go back once you have used high quality headphones. Lots of people don't care. There are also lots of people who do care, or would care if they were given the opportunity to hear really good sound (I hope!).

I've never really understood the "audiophile" term in the first place. Everyone hears different and if someone tells me that a certain pair of headphones are fantastic because they hear them as fantastic that means absolutely nothing to me. It matters how they sound to me and that's really all. Is being an "audiophile" some type of degree you earn? Aren't you just listening to music like everyone else? You might own more high tech equipment but that doesn't really mean you hear anything better than me, it just means that you've decided to invest more of your money into higher priced audio equipment that is supposed to sound better. How is that at all relevant to how something like the Airpods Max sound to each person?

My point being, when you put on a pair of AirPod Max's you aren't hearing anything more than anyone else is hearing. I don't understand why if an "audiophile" says these are good why that is supposed to mean anything to me.

If you don't care about sound quality then it wouldn't mean anything. If you do, someone who calls themself an audiophile is saying that they really care about the quality of music that they hear. There are a ton of audio options out there. If you are interested in figuring out which ones might work for you their experiences can guide you. Of course this depends on the individual.

I don't under why if a so called "critic" says these are good why that is supposed to mean anything to me.

A movie, music, play, or other critic watches/listens/watches to earn a living. To get paid that means that they have things to say that some people, maybe not you, might be interested in - if you happen to like that particular critic. They evaluate hundreds/thousands (over a lifetime) of pieces 8 hours a day which is impossible for someone who has to work in some other field to make a living. If you find a reviewer you like you can find things which otherwise you would have missed. It is like having a good work mentor who points you in the right direction.

So then everyone is an audiophile. Movie, tv, and even art critics are simply giving their opinion on the subject matter.

Yep. But they have massive historical experience, can do comparisons to pull the wheat from the chaff. Their opinion may not match your interests. I see a lot of critics who recommend jazz recordings. Since that's not my musical style I pretty much ignore them. I pay a lot of attention to critics who recommend the best sounding recordings. A lot of my music library is based on their recommendations. Without them I wouldn't have found these recordings, some of which are absolutely awesome.
 
  • Like
Reactions: russell_314
How's the soundstage compared to the open-back headphones I saw you own?
 
How's the soundstage compared to the open-back headphones I saw you own?

You do not get a good sound stage, one with width, height, and delineation of instruments simply using any top-end headphone with a Macbook, portable, iPhone, or dedicated amp. Very few HP sounds great with poor amps. The Airpods Max gives you a wide clear sound stage without the setup. For starters, it sounds as good as a Focal Clear driven by a Moon amp or equivalent. That's a terrific result. The imaging matches those from the Sony, but not as wide as the Abyss (ofc) and Utopia.
 
  • Like
Reactions: artfossil
thanks for the confirmation. I spoke w Apple service and they just recommend I send feedback and could choose the option to return. Grrrr, Apple could easily Make an extended stem piece about 1/2” longer and retrofit as necessary if the headphones are easily to take apart. Alot of larger head people would have this same issue .....

Send pics of ears and head.

Apple can do anything - will they make a custom fitting headset just for you? Unlikely.

Did you try the suggestion provided? Push the top part towards the back of your head so the cups can move down?
 
thanks for the confirmation. I spoke w Apple service and they just recommend I send feedback and could choose the option to return. Grrrr, Apple could easily Make an extended stem piece about 1/2” longer and retrofit as necessary if the headphones are easily to take apart. Alot of larger head people would have this same issue .....
I'm in the same boat. My wife surprised me with them for my birthday yesterday (I never would've let her spend that much on a pair of headphones while I've still got my Bose QC ones). I was beyond excited and then after about 30 minutes, I had a throbbing headache. After wasting more than an hour getting bounced around Apples "support" line, they told me the same thing. Just return them and leave feedback. I wear an XL hat and when I measured yesterday, I'm just below 23 7/8" which isn't even remotely outside the realm of normal head sizes.

I tried stretching them out on a box for a couple hours yesterday and then a couple hours today, but they just keep going back to their original tightness.

As many have pointed out, the headband is the cheapest part and so easy to remove, I can't understand why they wouldn't offer a larger option.

Oh well, if they get enough complaints maybe they'll eventually introduce the option.
 
  • Like
Reactions: turbineseaplane
Out of curiosity, did you take pictures from an iPhone? If yes which one?
Your pictures are amazing o_O
 
Thanks for the suggestion! Was a bit shocked by the clamping force from day one.

Have the AirPods Max for one month now and they really dig into my temples and it just starts to hurt too much. Wearing them almost the entire day.

I was afraid to ruin them by putting them over a wide object like a box or a basketball.

Because this is a first generation product I also wondered if the clamping force on mine was out of spec.

I contacted Apple Support through chat, they suggested mail in. After being sent to the local Apple Store they did not think anything was wrong with them but after a brief discussion we agreed to have them sent to the depot for inspection.

They checked hardware and software and sound quality. Everything was like it should be.

I did not expect anything from the investigation other than giving Apple a feedback signal that me and others experience pain when wearing these. (Never had similar issues with any other on-ear or over-ear headphones).

Guess I’ll have to stretch them out as well.

Will start with 1 hour at first and then increasing if it doesn’t give the results I want.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.