I was already unconvinced due to sound quality and battery life, but after reading this article I'm definitely out.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-38340748
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-38340748
Poorly thought out article? It appears to be factually based. £75 to replace the battery in each airpod? These things are disposable then.
""What's striking I think about this is more that, because the Airpod is so small and doesn't have a cable, it's going to be easier to lose," he told the BB"
It's "striking" that something small would be easier to lost than something that is not? STOP THE PRESSES!
It's somehow surprising that a charge would be incurred for replacing something you've lost?
There is literally no new information in this "article" whatsoever.
Making a decision based on someone else's review? Also, how dare Apple charge for a lost item! (Detect sarcasm). Sheesh.
Same goes for ALL competing brands. Doubt they do it.You aren't holding these airbuds, they aren't strapped to your body and they aren't physically connected to your phone. They are hanging in the outer portion of the ear canal and due to their undeniably weak attachment to the body people are going to lose these things whilst running for a tube or when someone brushes past them (or purposefully steals them from your ear). Apple should factor affordable single replacements into their marketing spiel because the design shouts that people are going to lose airbuds.
Same goes for ALL competing brands. Doubt they do it.
Poorly thought out article? It appears to be factually based. £75 to replace the battery in each airpod? These things are disposable then.
I agree. Sony for instance. I just think the whole wireless earbud market is a pointless moneygrab from manufacturers who are struggling to innovate.
They're less expensive than the other truly wireless competitors.I'm sure there are some people out there who need portable wireless earphones. However for the vast majority of us the battery life, sound quality, ease of loss and let's face it the price make these airbuds a pointless turkey.
then why are you making a thread about it?I was already unconvinced due to sound quality and battery life, but after reading this article I'm definitely out.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-38340748
what do you expect? then to replace it for free if you lose it?Poorly thought out article? It appears to be factually based. £75 to replace the battery in each airpod? These things are disposable then.
Poorly thought out article? It appears to be factually based. £75 to replace the battery in each airpod? These things are disposable then.
For someone fact obsessed, you still managed to severely misquote the price to replace a battery.
They've amended the prices since I pasted the link.
I went to a cash point this morning and got £300 out, the money was not fitted with fasteners and I lost it. I went back to the bank to get a replacement, I was was shocked when they asked for £300 to replace the £300. I think they should have given a discount like Apple do on their Airpods.You aren't holding these airbuds, they aren't strapped to your body and they aren't physically connected to your phone. They are hanging in the outer portion of the ear canal and due to their undeniably weak attachment to the body people are going to lose these things whilst running for a tube or when someone brushes past them (or purposefully steals them from your ear). Apple should factor affordable single replacements into their marketing spiel because the design shouts that people are going to lose airbuds.
You don't have to buy them.