I tried to make the proper height of the watch. The corners are obviously a little hard to do, but the height was proper.
I tried to make the proper height of the watch. The corners are obviously a little hard to do, but the height was proper.
Image
Two concerns:
1. How on earth was this photo taken safely?
2. Why are you wearing the paper rendition of the Apple Watch out in public?
Anyway, it looks nice...
I tried to make the proper height of the watch. The corners are obviously a little hard to do, but the height was proper.
Image
Two concerns:
1. How on earth was this photo taken safely?
Looks no bigger than my Pebble Steel, so I'm not worried about the 38mm version. 42mm might be pushing it on my wrist.
My concern now is the price. I would be ok spending up to $500 for the stainless with stainless link band. More than that and I will have to pass.
I tried to make the proper height of the watch.
For sure, it won't be $500. The 38mm Sport will be $349 and depending on increments, the Sport 42mm will either be $399 or $449....
You should paint the watch gold (to see if it looks good on your wrist)
For sure, it won't be $500. The 38mm Sport will be $349 and depending on increments, the Sport 42mm will either be $399 or $449. I don't think it'll be just a $50 jump to the stainless, especially with Gruber's comments from yesterday.
Probably more like $1000 for the Stainless Steel version.
Why do you think Stainless Steel would be as high as $1000 given it's not an expensive metal?
Why do you think Stainless Steel would be as high as $1000 given it's not an expensive metal?
You are probably looking at the Sports watch, add another 5 dollars on for the material change, and a few dollars more for the glass to crystal change.
There is no reason why the Stainless version (with the same rubber strap) should be anything more than say $150 over the Aluminium version.
$349 against $499
Even that would be a BIG mark up, way way over any manufacturing price difference.
You think it will be double that?
Different material Aluminium vs Stainless Steel and the glass change you think is worthy of being $650 more expensive?
Why?
Why do you think Stainless Steel would be as high as $1000 given it's not an expensive metal?
You are probably looking at the Sports watch, add another 5 dollars on for the material change, and a few dollars more for the glass to crystal change.
There is no reason why the Stainless version (with the same rubber strap) should be anything more than say $150 over the Aluminium version.
$349 against $499
Even that would be a BIG mark up, way way over any manufacturing price difference.
You think it will be double that?
Different material Aluminium vs Stainless Steel and the glass change you think is worthy of being $650 more expensive?
Why?
Why do you think Stainless Steel would be as high as $1000 given it's not an expensive metal?
That's like saying why should 128 gigs be $200 more than the base model given it's not an expensive component? This is Apple and that's how they do it.
However, I don't think it'll start at $1000 (at least the SS model with the sport band). However, the high-end SS models (with the Milanese Loop and Link Bracelet) might be around $1000.
That's like saying why should 128 gigs be $200 more than the base model given it's not an expensive component? This is Apple and that's how they do it.
However, I don't think it'll start at $1000 (at least the SS model with the sport band). However, the high-end SS models (with the Milanese Loop and Link Bracelet) might be around $1000.
Because this is Apple and I don't think the Sapphire display is as cheap as some people believe.
How does Apple upsell someone to a SS watch with Sport band if it's $300-$400 more than its aluminum counterpart?
How does Apple upsell someone to a SS watch with Sport band if it's $300-$400 more than its aluminum counterpart?