Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Sorry, but this doesn't make me feel confident this representative knows what they are talking about. "Enable it after repair"? The user has to somehow setup something to get it working? There's no setup procedure for the O2 sensor -- it either works or it doesn't.
They were referring to having to pair it again, didn’t post all of the conversation as it had some private info in there.
My point is, talk to them before initiating a replacement and have them confirm.
 
That’s not an Apple decision, but rather the ITC. Warranty repairs were determined to be exempt from the ban.

Be glad with the current situation. Masimo argued even warranty repairs should be banned as Apple could issue refunds instead.
Yes, AC+ is an extended warranty.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KeithBN
Sorry, but this doesn't make me feel confident this representative knows what they are talking about. "Enable it after repair"? The user has to somehow setup something to get it working? There's no setup procedure for the O2 sensor -- it either works or it doesn't.
This is exactly why I searched for old stock of the Ultra 2 (found it on Costco in November 2024), to ensure I would have my sensor activated until the patent ban was figured out. My Ultra 1 has AC+, but I’m not 100% sure I would receive a replacement with the sensor enabled. Having a friend who had her S6 replaced under AC+ with the sensor disabled, didn’t help me feel any confident the replacement would have it enabled.
 
Thank you, JZ for your report — and Night Spring for his cautionary note.

Definitely endorse the idea of recording or taking screenshots of Apple Support's judgment of this and saving them as evidence. And, somehow, putting them on notice one's expectation is for the oxygen sensor to be enabled on the replacement Watch.

Wonder what recourse we'd have, though, if they promise it in a chat or phone call, and then the replacement doesn't have it. At a minimum, they should refund any AC+ renewal fees.

In one thread (on Reddit, perhaps), several users brought up the fine print in Apple's licenses that permits removal of features at their discretion. That’s chilling, dismaying, or boilerplate, but could give them a defense or justification for disable the oxygen feature.

Given that Apple is probably *importing* the replacements for coverage under AC+, the court-ordered import ban would apply and likely mean that the oxygen sensors on those would have to be turned off.

Given the uncertainty around all this, I'm leaning to not renewing AC+ unless I see an official Apple declaration that replacements under AC+ will have the oxygen sensor enabled or I come across a bunch of reports of Watch replacements that have it enabled!
 
Thank you, JZ for your report — and Night Spring for his cautionary note.

Definitely endorse the idea of recording or taking screenshots of Apple Support's judgment of this and saving them as evidence. And, somehow, putting them on notice one's expectation is for the oxygen sensor to be enabled on the replacement Watch.

Wonder what recourse we'd have, though, if they promise it in a chat or phone call, and then the replacement doesn't have it. At a minimum, they should refund any AC+ renewal fees.

In one thread (on Reddit, perhaps), several users brought up the fine print in Apple's licenses that permits removal of features at their discretion. That’s chilling, dismaying, or boilerplate, but could give them a defense or justification for disable the oxygen feature.

Given that Apple is probably *importing* the replacements for coverage under AC+, the court-ordered import ban would apply and likely mean that the oxygen sensors on those would have to be turned off.

Given the uncertainty around all this, I'm leaning to not renewing AC+ unless I see an official Apple declaration that replacements under AC+ will have the oxygen sensor enabled or I come across a bunch of reports of Watch replacements that have it enabled!
recourse I would take is small claims court.

re renewing AC+, that is of course entirely up to you. My S7 (Ti edition) expired a month or so ago and I did extend it, battery health sits at 81% so some time to go. it's my backup watch, only use it for sleep tracking every other night but SpO2 during sleep is important to me. I also have AC+ on my Ultra 2 (Sep '23 so with SpO2) cause I bang my watch all the time so AC+ is important for me from that perspective.
And I seem to remember some article where Apple was cited that the ban does not impact watches under warranty, just can't find it right now
 
Having a friend who had her S6 replaced under AC+ with the sensor disabled, didn’t help me feel any confident the replacement would have it enabled.
Very strange, I had my s6 replaced last month under AC+ and I had SPo2 enabled. Before I gave my AW in store, I asked the rep if I was going to have oxygen sensor enabled. I was looking at Ultra 2 with sensor enabled in Costco but decided to get S6 replaced. Hopefully Ultra 3 will have the sensor enabled.
 
Very strange, I had my s6 replaced last month under AC+ and I had SPo2 enabled. Before I gave my AW in store, I asked the rep if I was going to have oxygen sensor enabled. I was looking at Ultra 2 with sensor enabled in Costco but decided to get S6 replaced. Hopefully Ultra 3 will have the sensor enabled.
Until I see it in writing from Apple, I’ll believe the replacement will have the sensor enabled. My Ultra 2 is 2 months old, so I’m good for the next 4 years before I upgrade and by the time the patent will have expired. I knew there was the possibility of the Ultra 3 being released this year or next year, but I still upgraded my Ultra 1.
 
Finally my Apple watch 7 battery life dropped to 79 percent and I received notification battery required service. I called support and long story, short, watch replacement (it seems they replace the watch, not the battery) would have blood oxygen sensor disabled due to legal reasons. Also I had to do so via store visit, they could not do via sending prepaid box as he originally stated. He said replacement would still be an Apple watch 7 just with oxygen sensor disabled. He also stated same as what the store genius rep had told me a couple of months ago, no current watch sold anywhere in the world has enabled oxygen sensor which I believe refutes what some people had stated in this forum.

I'm going to keep using mu Apple Watch for the time being. I'm upset and feel Apple has the resources and capitol to settle this lawsuit, even if they have to admit a little wrong and most likely will not buy a new watch until this matter is resolved. Has anybody read about any light at the end of the tunnel in this regard?
Had my S7 replaced in Germany not even two months ago. My sensor is still enabled. These guys need to be on MacRumors more often or informed better it seems, sheesh

EDIT: I know that the sensor remains enabled outside the US!
I was referring to what OP said, what was told to him by an Apple employee.
Thanks for all the heads ups but I am not the one that didn’t get the memo.
 
Last edited:
This is one of the reasons why I was adamant about whether my Ultra 1 would have the sensor activated when it was time for a battery replacement. My Ultra 1 is at 85% battery health, so in November last year, I purchased an Ultra 2 from Costco’s old stock and it still had the sensor activated. That should hold me over until 2028 when I’ll be due for an upgrade.
Or, you could order an Apple Watch from eBay from a seller who doesn’t have any natural titanium Apple Watch Ultra or other Apple Watches. ⌚️ I ended up getting an older series 6 brand new because of my Apple Watch Series 1 screen got separated after seven years. I’m not sure how it’ll work out if a refurbished Apple Watch from a non-Apple seller has the blood oxygen feature, unless it’s directly from Apple if the Genius at the Apple Store was right. Did you guys run into this issue when you had an Apple Watch with AppleCare and bought it before the January ban last year?
 
Wow, I was under the impression that the sensor was only disabled on the S9, S10, and Ultras. I had no idea they were disabling them on older models.
 
  • Like
Reactions: goldmac2006
Curious, does anybody know physically what the sensor looks like? Is it a separate piece of hardware that can be identified by viewing the back of the watch? It seems like it is, but I'm curious if it's verified the sensor is present in US sold Apple watch 10's, just not enabled or completely removed altogether?
Yes. The lights on the back of the watch. The green lights are for pulse, and the red lights are for blood oxygen
 
Yes. The lights on the back of the watch. The green lights are for pulse, and the red lights are for blood oxygen
But those lights are visible only when the sensor is active, right? Can you see the sensors when they aren't active?
 
Switch to the Garmin side where they have Blood Oxygen and a much better battery that you won't need to replace! Plus, you also dont have Apple. Apple pretends that competition doesnt exist, well Garmin is the competition and they are constantly innovating!
I won’t follow on this, man. I like the blood oxygen feature and will stay on wearing an Apple Watch. ⌚️
 
  • Like
Reactions: Momof2.1107
But those lights are visible only when the sensor is active, right? Can you see the sensors when they aren't active?
The sensor is the actual thing you’re seeing on the back of your watch. There’s 4 sensors. You can see them just by looking. When they’re lighted up they’re active.
 
The sensor is the actual thing you’re seeing on the back of your watch. There’s 4 sensors. You can see them just by looking. When they’re lighted up they’re active.
See that ring? That’s the sensor. It’s active when it’s taking a reading, so there’s lights. When it’s not reading it’s just that ring in the center.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1108.jpeg
    IMG_1108.jpeg
    360.3 KB · Views: 23
See that ring? That’s the sensor. It’s active when it’s taking a reading, so there’s lights. When it’s not reading it’s just that ring in the center.
So do those rings look the same on older watches that didn't have the O2 sensors, or are there more rings on the newer watches? Like, ones with O2 sensors have 8 rings, and ones without have, like 4?
 
So do those rings look the same on older watches that didn't have the O2 sensors, or are there more rings on the newer watches? Like, ones with O2 sensors have 8 rings, and ones without have, like 4?
On the older Apple Watch there were 4 sensors in a circle. For Apple Watches with o2 sensors there’s 2 that shine green light, which is for pulse, and two that shine red light. You can see them when you wear your watch in the dark.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Night Spring
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.