Did that too but switched back, I still prefer multiple matching monitors when I'm working.Been there and done that, came from 3 27” myself... try a 38” or 43” and you will be ditching the dual/triple monitor...
Did that too but switched back, I still prefer multiple matching monitors when I'm working.Been there and done that, came from 3 27” myself... try a 38” or 43” and you will be ditching the dual/triple monitor...
Did that too but switched back, I still prefer multiple matching monitors when I'm working.
Not sure. The pixel pitch on a 43 inch 4K is very low, as low as a 24 inch 1080P. The display is big, but text doesn't look "sharper". And you are always trying to cut the display in half with two apps or even in four ... Physical displays > logical displays to me.Been there and done that, came from 3 27” myself... try a 38” or 43” and you will be ditching the dual/triple monitor...
Hello,
I may need another 13" Macbook Pro soon, and the M1 seems like a very attractive option. Is there anything that might make me regret buying it instead of its Intel brother?
One extremely annoying thing that I've noticed is that the M1 has only two USB-C ports, only on the left hand side.
Though I'm terribly disappointed in Apple for resorting to such pitiful cost saving tricks, I think I could live with that if the rest of the device were really as terrific as they say. What I'm a bit worried about are things that may not be visible at first glance. For instance, application compatibility issues.
Are there apps which are known to depend on the Intel architecture and to be incompatible with ARM? Virtualization software springs to mind, but there may be others.
Any other drawbacks?
Apple has launched a 2020 refresh of the Intel 13" Macbook Pro at the same time as the M1, and they're both on sale simultaneously at nearly the same price. This makes me think that there may still be some reasons for buying the Intel, otherwise they would have discontinued it. I'm curious as to what those reasons might be.
Thank you.
As @pldelisle mentioned, Intel on the Mac platform is dead now. There is no roadmap other than an undetermined period of support, so don't waste your money. As an owner of an M1 MacBook Pro I can categorically say it is so much better than the previous Intel efforts it's laughable.
...Or if your apps aren't yet performing well and you need something now? Don't forget, most people upgrade their Macs after five years, on average. The hardware end of this transition will take another year and a half at least. Most apps will take even longer.If you have a specific app need, check compatibility here: https://isapplesiliconready.com
For those Intel apps that work, I can see no performance difference on my M1. If you absolutely need more RAM or ports etc, wait. Don't burn cash on an Intel Mac unless you absolutely have to (e.g. x86 VM support).
Active Trader Pro works fine with Big Sur. there was any update issued early Nov (I think). In any case I used it yesterday without issue. this was on both a 2013 Mac Pro, and and new M1 Mac Mini.
If I'm not mistaken, there were two versions of the 13" Macbook Pro before the M1 came out. A low-end one, which had a row of buttons at the top of the keyboard and two USB-C ports, and a high-end one, which had a touch bar and four USB-C ports. Since the M1 has a touchbar, I assumed that it was supposed to replace the high-end one. Maybe my assumption was incorrect. If that's the case, then maybe we can expect an M1 with four ports in the near future?The Intel laptops it replaced also only has two ports.
It's not necessarily about need, because the need can be fulfilled with the help of a USB hub. It's more about comfort. The comfort of being able to charge it from either side. Or the comfort of not having to use a USB hub. Let's not forget that there aren't actually two ports, since one of them will be occupied by the charger most of the time. So for all practical purposes it's as if it only had one.How many ports do you guys need?
99% of the time I use only one for the monitor, the other .1% I use the other port to connect to my usb hub for the external ssd for backup...
I see. Our local Apple retailer is marketing the Intel 13" Macbooks as a 2020 model, hence my assumption that it was a refresh.You got it wrong. Apple didn't launch a refresh of the Intel 13" MacBook Pro, save for maybe preloading them with Big Sur instead of Catalina. They kept the May 2020 4-port Intel Ice Lake model around while discontinuing the May 2020 2-port Intel Coffee Lake ULV based model and replacing it with the M1 model. No other Intel Macs came out alongside the M1 Macs.
The 4 USB-C port Intel 13" Macbook is a 2020 model. As mentioned, it was released in May of 2020 with the 10 gen Intel mobile CPUs (Apple released a few new Intel Macs this year including the 2020 27" iMac, the first (and probably last) regular iMac with a T2 coprocessor). The lower end two port model was replaced with the M1 Macbook.If I'm not mistaken, there were two versions of the 13" Macbook Pro before the M1 came out. A low-end one, which had a row of buttons at the top of the keyboard and two USB-C ports, and a high-end one, which had a touch bar and four USB-C ports. Since the M1 has a touchbar, I assumed that it was supposed to replace the high-end one. Maybe my assumption was incorrect. If that's the case, then maybe we can expect an M1 with four ports in the near future?
It's not necessarily about need, because the need can be fulfilled with the help of a USB hub. It's more about comfort. The comfort of being able to charge it from either side. Or the comfort of not having to use a USB hub. Let's not forget that there aren't actually two ports, since one of them will be occupied by the charger most of the time. So for all practical purposes it's as if it only had one.
I can live with that if I have to, but it would be nice if the M1 was an upgrade from all points of view, rather than an upgrade in some respects and a downgrade in others.
I see. Our local Apple retailer is marketing the Intel 13" Macbooks as a 2020 model, hence my assumption that it was a refresh.
Thank you for the comprehensive reply. That answers all my questions.
If I'm not mistaken, there were two versions of the 13" Macbook Pro before the M1 came out. A low-end one, which had a row of buttons at the top of the keyboard and two USB-C ports, and a high-end one, which had a touch bar and four USB-C ports. Since the M1 has a touchbar, I assumed that it was supposed to replace the high-end one. Maybe my assumption was incorrect. If that's the case, then maybe we can expect an M1 with four ports in the near future?
If I'm not mistaken, there were two versions of the 13" Macbook Pro before the M1 came out. A low-end one, which had a row of buttons at the top of the keyboard and two USB-C ports, and a high-end one, which had a touch bar and four USB-C ports. Since the M1 has a touchbar, I assumed that it was supposed to replace the high-end one. Maybe my assumption was incorrect. If that's the case, then maybe we can expect an M1 with four ports in the near future?
I can live with that if I have to, but it would be nice if the M1 was an upgrade from all points of view, rather than an upgrade in some respects and a downgrade in others.
For sure, and if they're referring to the 4-port model, that is still being sold today. I'm VERY likely going to buy one in the not too distant future. There are clearance sales going on to try to sell off remaining stock of the 2020 2-port Intel 13" MacBook Pro. I'm not sure how good of a buy that is at this point.I see. Our local Apple retailer is marketing the Intel 13" Macbooks as a 2020 model, hence my assumption that it was a refresh.