It has barely just launched in it's current iteration.I have been excited for iTunes match since Jobs announced it quite some time ago. I have a large library, and can't use it as of now. Any idea if that restriction will be lifted?
I think iTunes match is a step in the right direction, but required download to portable devices is kinda like FaceTime only being allowed on wifi....pretty useless!
It's not a question of entitlement. It's a dissapointment that I am utterly unable to use the service, unless I want to create a separate library with just a portion of my songs, which takes away the whole point of itunes match in the first place.
You can try taking the songs you don't care about and marking them as podcasts. That way Match will overlook them and possibly get you within the limit.
It's not a question of entitlement. It's a dissapointment that I am utterly unable to use the service, unless I want to create a separate library with just a portion of my songs, which takes away the whole point of itunes match in the first place.
I just downloaded an album from within Music while on 3G. Wi-Fi is not required.
EDIT* It seems Wi-Fi IS required for songs that are over 10 MBs. Just tried to download 2112 and got an error.
I was pleasantly surprised last night when iTunes Match matched roughly 11,000 songs out of my 12,600+. The thing that gets me is that it will match an entire album but miss one song. If all of the metadata is the same, why didn't it match? I guess this is why it's still in beta.
To say the service is useless to you because you can't have more music than you could listen to in a lifetime is a bit short sited.
It's useless if you DO have a large collection because the feature is entirely turned off for Users with more than 25,000 tracks in their collection.
Image
I have over 40,000 tracks and it is definitely not more than a lifetime of songs (126.7 days).
So it is useless to people who have large collections, because the service is entirely unavailable to them. And I really don't want to spend hours pruning through my collection to make it fit with Apple. I'll just use another service instead.
So it is useless to people who have large collections, because the service is entirely unavailable to them. And I really don't want to spend hours pruning through my collection to make it fit with Apple. I'll just use another service instead.
...I have over 40,000 tracks and it is definitely not more than a lifetime of songs (126.7 days)...
The thing that gets me is that it will match an entire album but miss one song. If all of the metadata is the same, why didn't it match? I guess this is why it's still in beta.
I think that the real problem with iTunes Match is the fact that they do not allow you to exclude songs that will be matched. If anything iTunes should be able to utilize it's check-box to exclude songs that are not checked from iTunes Match.]
Even if we could identify which songs we wanted matched by adding them to a playlist much like Spotify it would be grand. Until then, it seems that for anyone with a library of over 25,000 songs must either keep a second library of their favorite songs or just not use the service.
But you can already do this so I'm not sure why you are complaining. The solution is simple. Remove songs from your library but do not delete them until you have 25k library or smaller. Then turn on iTunes match. Once iTunes match is finished matching and uploading that 25k library, and only once it is done, re-add all your songs, up to whatever crazy amount you have, and the first 25k will work with iTunes match, the rest added after the 25k songs are synced will be excluded from iTunes Match. You should inform yourself first before you complain about things.