Is the new mini SATA 150 or 300?
If it's the slower one will I be throwing a lot of performance away by getting a X-25M?
The new mini is SATA 300 - so the interface should still be faster than the SSD.
I have still been doing a lot of research on the SSDs - because if I do purchase a Mac Mini I'm pretty certain I will be putting one in.
As of right now, with OCZ's newly released SSDs, it looks like the top choices for reliability and speed are (all prices and specs come from NewEgg):
1. OCZ Vertex (Read: 200 MB/s, Write: 160 MB/s) 60 GB = $279
2. Intel X-25M (Read: 250 MB/s, Write: 70 MB/s) 80 GB = $393
3. OCZ Apex (Read: 230 MB/s, Write: 160 MB/s) 120 GB = $319
The OCZ Apex looks like a good deal. It has internal RAID 0, with two of the older JMicron controllers that were the source of problems for so many owners. It seems that the RAID 0 plus some cache has alleviated the problems, but RAID 0 bothers me and I'm not sure long term if there would be any problems with that design.
If I was going to buy today, I think I would probably end up going with the OCZ Vertex, which was just released this year, It has received lots of good reviews and is a second generation SSD that does not have the JMicron controller.
I liked the Intel X-25M, but I don't know if it is worth the extra money and slower write speed in comparison to the Vertex. Last week, the Intel would have been my first choice - but after doing more research it appears that this new Vertex from OCZ might be just as reliable, less expensive and better performing...